Minimal clinically important difference for quadriceps maximal voluntary contraction following pulmonary rehabilitation in people with interstitial lung disease - 22/10/25

Abstract |
Background |
Skeletal muscle loss has a devastating effect on daily lives of people with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves muscle strength; however, the lack of cut-off values to define clinical improvement limits the interpretability of the obtained gains.
Objective |
To estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for quadriceps maximal voluntary contraction (QMVC) in people with ILD, assessed with hand-held dynamometry as an absolute value in kilogram-force (KgF) and as percentage of the predicted value (% pred), after PR in people with ILD.
Methods |
A secondary analysis of data from three previous studies was conducted. Participants took part in a 12-week community-based PR programme. The MCIDs were computed using anchor- and distribution-based methods. Anchors explored were the 1-min sit-to-stand (1-min STS) test, the 6-min walking distance, handgrip strength, modified Medical Research Council questionnaire, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Subscale. The pooled MCIDs were computed using the weighted arithmetic mean (2/3 anchor and 1/3 distribution-based methods).
Results |
Fifty-nine people with ILD (61 % female, 66 ± 11years) were included in the analysis. The 1-min STS test was the only anchor fitting the criteria. There were significant improvements after PR in the QMVC (mean difference = 3.9 ± 8.2 KgF and median difference = 10.9 [1.6; 22.0] % pred, p < 0.001) and 1-min STS test (mean difference = 6.6 ± 7.1 repetitions, p < 0.001). The pooled MCIDs were 3.2 KgF and 10.6 % pred.
Conclusion |
An increase of at least 3.2 KgF or 10.6 % pred for QMVC in people with ILD after PR represents clinically relevant improvements.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | MCIDs for QMVC assessed with HHD in ILD after PR have been proposed. |
• | Improvements of at least 3.2 KgF or 10.6 % predicted for QMVC are clinically relevant. |
• | These MCIDs may provide guidance for clinical decision-making in ILD management. |
Keywords : Diffuse parenchymal lung disease, Strength, Lower limb, Exercise, Education, Clinical improvements
Plan
Vol 248
Article 108351- novembre 2025 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
