Corrigendum to “Does spinal chloroprocaine pharmacokinetic profile actually translate into a clinical advantage in terms of clinical outcomes when compared to low-dose spinal bupivacaine? A systematic review and meta-analysis” [Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2019;52: 99–104] - 23/10/25
Doi : 10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111889
Andrea Saporito a, Marcello Ceppi b, Andreas Perren c, Davide La Regina d, Stefano Cafarotti d, Alain Borgeat e, ⁎ 
, José Aguirre e, Marc Van De Velde f, An Teunkens f
, José Aguirre e, Marc Van De Velde f, An Teunkens f a Anesthesia Department, Bellinzona Regional Hospital, Switzerland
b Clinical Epidemiology Unit, S. Martino University Hospital, Genoa, Italy
c Intensive Care Unit, Bellinzona Regional Hospital, Switzerland
d Surgery Department, Bellinzona Regional Hospital, Switzerland
e Department of Anesthesiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
f Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of the KU, Leuven, Belgium
⁎ Corresponding author at: Department of Anesthesiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. Department of Anesthesiology Balgrist University Hospital Zurich Switzerland
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.
© 2025
Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Vol 107
Article 111889- novembre 2025 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Corrigendum to “Comparisons in analgesic effects between ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and surgical intercostal nerve block after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial” [Journal of clinical Anesthesia 95 (2024) 111448]
- Chun-Sung Sung, Tzu-Jung Wei, Jung-Jyh Hung, Fu-Wei Su, Shih-I Ho, Mong-Wei Lin, Kuang-Cheng Chan, Chun-Yu Wu
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?