Assessment of two olfactory training methods for post-COVID-19 loss of olfaction: Classical and intensive - 08/11/25
, P.L. Nguyen-Thi b, P. Gallet a, R. Jankowski a, C. Rumeau a, D.T. Nguyen a, ⁎
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.
Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!
Abstract |
Objectives |
To determine whether intensive olfactory training provides better chances of recovery than classic protocols in persistent dysosmia after Covid-19.
Introduction |
In the literature, olfactory training holds pride of place in the management of post-infection olfactory disorder, with a classic 4-odor protocol. On the other hand, few studies have assessed the benefit of more intensive training.
Materials and methods |
This prospective randomized clinical trial (No. 2020-A01397-32) assessed olfactory training for persistent dysosmia due to COVID-19, with 5 weeks’ to 12 months’ progression. Patients were divided between 2 groups, receiving a classical 4-odor protocol (n=49) or an intensive 8-odor protocol (n=30). Olfaction was assessed in consultation on the Sniffin’ Sticks test, the DyNaChron self-reported olfaction questionnaire and a visual analogue scale (VAS), at inclusion (V1) and at 4 and 8 months (V2 and V3, respectively).
Results |
Both protocols significantly improved subjective olfactory assessment on VAS, with non-significant trends for improvement on psychophysical tests. There was no significant difference in olfactory recovery between the classic and intensive protocols. Adhesion to the training program decreased markedly beyond 4 months.
Conclusion |
Intensive olfactory training did not increase the chances of olfactory recovery compared to the classic protocol in a population with persistent dysosmia following COVID-19 infection.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Post-viral anosmia and hyposmia, COVID-19, Olfactory training, Sniffin’ Sticks test, DyNaChron, VAS, SARS-CoV-2
Plan
Vol 142 - N° 6
P. 294-300 - novembre 2025 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Improving the language environment for children with cochlear implants, using the LENA language and environment analysis system – A CONSORT analysis
- M. Lathuilliere, I. Prang, M.-C. Picot, V. Macioce, M. Mondain, N. Loundon
- Binaural performance in 155 adults with single-sided or asymmetric profound hearing loss: A STROBE analysis
- M. Marx, S. Taoui, I. Mosnier, F. Venail, M. Mondain, A. Uziel, D. Bakhos, E. Lescanne, Y. NGuyen, D. Bernardeschi, O. Sterkers, B. Godey, G. Creff, S. Schmerber, N.-X. Bonne, C. Vincent, B. Fraysse, O. Deguine, B. Lepage
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.