Evidence-based Skin Antisepsis for Urologic Surgery: A Narrative Review - 13/11/25
, Gina M. BadalatoRésumé |
Surgical site infections complicate 2%-4% of surgical procedures performed annually in the United States and are associated with increased post-operative morbidity and mortality. Reducing the risk of surgical site infections through evidence-based strategies, including the use of appropriate pre-operative skin antisepsis, is therefore of critical importance. In this narrative review, we aim to review the major antiseptic skin agents used in urologic surgery. Specifically, this review offers an up-to-date evaluation of the evidence supporting optimal surgical antisepsis practices across urologic abdominal, transurethral, transvaginal, and prosthetic surgeries.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Given the role as Deputy Editor, Gina M. Badalato had no involvement in the peer review of this article and had no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to another editor of the journal. |
Vol 205
P. 331-336 - novembre 2025 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Utility and Perspectives of Mobile Health Applications Used in Postoperative Care After Urological Surgery
- Jian Ning Jan Hoe, Dillon Christopher Yong Jie Teo, Wei Zheng So, Ho Yee Tiong
- Does Variable Clamping Pressure Endanger Urologic Prosthetic Tubing?
- Logan W. Grimaud, Jeremy A. Kurnot, Matthew Salvino, Andrew C. Peterson, Aaron C. Lentz
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?