S'abonner

Maternal risk stratification and planned birth improve pregnancy outcomes at term: a population-based cohort study - 17/11/25

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.10.005 
Cynthia Wong, MBBS a, Kylie Crawford, PhD b, c, Jesrine Hong, MRCOG a, b, c, e, Shannyn Rosser, FRANZCOG a, b, c, Vicki Flenady, PhD b, d, Susannah Leisher, MA, PhD f, Robert Silver, MD f, g, Sailesh Kumar, FRCS, FRCOG, FRANZCOG, DPhil (Oxon) a, b, c, d,
a Mater Mothers’ Hospital, South Brisbane, Australia 
b Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Australia 
c The University of Queensland Medical School, Herston, Australia 
d National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, South Brisbane, Australia 
e Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 
f School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 
g Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 

Corresponding author: Sailesh Kumar, FRCS, FRCOG, FRANZCOG, DPhil (Oxon).Sailesh Kumar, FRCS, FRCOG, FRANZCOG, DPhil (Oxon)
Sous presse. Épreuves corrigées par l'auteur. Disponible en ligne depuis le Monday 17 November 2025

Abstract

Background

In many countries, antenatal maternal risk stratification and individualization of subsequent pregnancy care are ubiquitous. However, because of the dynamic nature of pregnancy and emergence of new risk factors as gestation progresses, it is unclear whether this approach results in better pregnancy outcomes.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between antenatal maternal risk stratification and maternal and perinatal outcomes, and to ascertain if planned birth at 39 weeks of gestation resulted in better pregnancy outcomes at term.

Study Design

This was a retrospective cohort study of 1,167,372 singleton births at ≥37+0 weeks’ gestation, conducted from 2000 to 2021 in Queensland, Australia. Women were stratified into 3 risk categories (high, intermediate, or low) in accordance with recommendations from international guidelines. The study outcomes were severe adverse maternal outcome, perinatal mortality (antepartum stillbirth, intrapartum stillbirth, and neonatal death), severe neonatal neurologic morbidity, and maternal–infant separation. Multivariable logistic regression models were built to determine odds ratios for the effect of maternal risk strata on study outcomes and the effect of planned birth (either induction of labor or scheduled cesarean delivery) at 39+0 to 39+6 weeks compared with expectant management.

Results

A total of 468,710 (40.2%) women were categorized as low-risk, 324,650 (27.8%) as intermediate-risk, and 374,012 (32.0%) as high-risk. Compared with low-risk women, the odds of severe maternal adverse outcome, perinatal mortality, severe neonatal neurologic morbidity, and maternal–infant separation were increased in the intermediate- and high-risk groups, with the highest odds in the high-risk cohort. The probability of severe adverse maternal outcome was lowest at 39+0 to 39+6 weeks for all risk categories. Regardless of maternal risk stratum, the probability of perinatal mortality was lowest at 39+0 to 40+6 weeks, the probability of severe neonatal neurologic morbidity was lowest at 38+0 to 39+6 weeks, and the nadir for maternal–infant separation occurred at 39+0 to 40+6 weeks. For all study outcomes, the probability of an adverse outcome increased from 40+0 weeks onward regardless of risk category.

Conclusion

The risks of severe maternal and perinatal outcomes including maternal–infant separation are directly associated with antenatally determined maternal risk strata. Women in the high-risk category had the highest odds of all adverse outcomes. However, compared with expectant management, planned birth at 38+0 to 39+6 weeks, especially by scheduled cesarean delivery, was associated with the lowest odds of adverse outcomes, particularly for women in the high-risk category.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Video


(22.88 Mo)

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : adverse birth outcomes, antenatal care, cesarean delivery, neurologic mobility, perinatal maternal–infant separation, perinatal mortality, planned birth, pregnancy, pregnancy risk stratification, severe neonatal morbidity, stillbirth


Plan


 C.W., K.C., and J.H. share first authorship.
 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 This study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council and the Mater Foundation.
 Data sharing statement: All code, scripts, and data used to produce the results in this article will be available to any researcher provided that appropriate ethics approval, interinstitutional data-sharing agreements, and other regulatory requirements are in place. Additional specific approval from the Data Custodian of the Statistical Services Branch of Queensland’s Department of Health will also be required. Some approvals are outside the remit of the authors.
 Ethics approval: This study was approved by the Metro North Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference number: LNR/219/QRBC/53154).
 Cite this article as: Wong C, Crawford K, Hong J, et al. Maternal risk stratification and planned birth improve pregnancy outcomes at term: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2025;XX:x.ex–x.ex.


© 2025  The Authors. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.