Testing the activity pacing questionnaire for validity, reliability and responsiveness: An outcome measure validation study - 27/11/25
, Gareth McCray b, Rosa MacKenzie c, Janiece Marriott-Smith d, Kathryn Cawley e, Melanie A. Holden bAbstract |
Activity pacing aims to manage symptoms of chronic pain and improve function by modifying pain-related behaviours: avoidance, overdoing and overdoing-underdoing cycling. Research regarding the effectiveness of activity pacing is unclear, and hindered by the absence of a validated scale. The previously developed 28-item Activity Pacing Questionnaire (APQ-28) comprises five domains: Activity adjustment, Activity planning, Activity consistency, Activity progression and Activity acceptance. This study aimed to shorten the APQ and provide evidence for its validity, reliability and responsiveness. Paper-based questionnaires collected data from patients with chronic pain attending healthcare services in England, UK, at baseline (n=347), and again at 2-weeks (n=130) and 12-weeks (n=121). Outcome measures included the APQ-28, and other measures of pacing, avoidance, overdoing, pain, self-efficacy, quality of life, physical/mental function, depression and anxiety. Statistical analyses explored validity, reliability, responsiveness and measurement error. Factor analysis (n=347) showed poor model fit for the previous five-factor model, leading to selecting a four-factor model (removing Activity acceptance) with three items per domain, forming the APQ-12 (CFI=0.995, TLI=0.992, RMSEA=0.052, SRMR=0.050). The four domains showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha=0.70–0.84) and test-retest reliability (n=130, ICC=0.53–0.64). Only Activity consistency showed significant responsiveness (n=121, Rho=0.27, 95% CI=0.1–0.43). Measurement error of the APQ-12 domains included smallest detectable change (range=1.55–1.76), standard error of measurement (range=0.56–0.63) and minimally important change (range=-0.17–0.33). Confirmatory factor analysis on external data supported the four-domain structure (CFI=0.983, TLI=0.977, RMSEA=0.071, SRMR=0.106). The APQ-12 shows promise as a multi-domain measure of activity pacing for use in clinical practice and future research.
Perspective |
This article presents the psychometric properties of the 12-item Activity Pacing Questionnaire (APQ-12). The APQ-12 provides a multi-domain measure of activity pacing. It has potential clinical and research use to assess changes in activity pacing and explore the effects of activity pacing on symptoms of chronic pain.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | Activity pacing is frequently advised as a coping strategy for chronic pain. |
• | The effects of activity pacing on symptoms of chronic pain are currently unclear. |
• | The 12-item activity pacing questionnaire (APQ-12) provides a multidimensional measure of pacing. |
• | The APQ-12 comprises four domains of activity pacing which show validity and reliability. |
• | The APQ-12 can be used in clinical and research settings to assess activity pacing. |
Keywords : Activity pacing, Scale validation, Chronic pain, Questionnaire
Plan
| ☆ | Sponsor’s representative: Professor Steve Woby, Managing Director of Research & Innovation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Summerfield House, 544 Eccles New Road, Salford, M5 5AP, email: Steve.Woby@nca.nhs.uk |
Vol 37
Article 105568- décembre 2025 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
