Comparison of spectral performance of three dual-energy CT scanners equipped with a deep-learning image reconstruction algorithm and one photon counting CT scanner: A phantom study - 29/11/25
Highlights |
• | Deep-learning reconstruction algorithms and photon-counting CT help reduce image noise and improve the detectability of simulated contrast-enhanced lesions on low-keV virtual monoenergetic images. |
• | At 40 or 50 keV, the best combined results (based on both objective and subjective assessments) are obtained with the dual-layer CT and the photon-counting CT scanners. |
• | The accuracy of iodine concentrations is in the same order of magnitude for all dual-energy CT scanners. |
Abstract |
Purpose |
The purpose of this study was to compare the spectral performance of three dual-energy CT (DECT) scanners and one photon-counting CT (PCCT) scanner on virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at low-energy levels and on iodine maps.
Materials and methods |
A spectral phantom was scanned using one PCCT scanner and three different DECT scanners that included a rapid kV-switching CT (R-KVSCT), an ultrafast kV-switching (U-KVSCT) and a dual-layer CT (DLCT) scanner. Acquisitions were obtained with each CT system using classical abdominal and pelvic examination parameters, as well as a volume CT dose index at 11 mGy. VMI at 40/50/60/70 keV and iodine maps were reconstructed for each scanner. Noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were evaluated. Detectability indexes (d') were computed to model the detection task of two contrast-enhanced lesions.
Results |
Noise magnitude decreased from 40 to 70 keV for all DECT scanners and this decrease was greater for R-KVSCT (-80.0 ± 0.1 [standard deviation (SD)] %) and less pronounced for DLCT (-14.4 ± 0.8 [SD] %) scanners. The average NPS spatial frequency (f av ) values decreased from 40 to 70 keV (0.26 to 0.17 mm -1 ) for R-KVSCT, increased for DLCT (0.18 to 0.25 mm -1 ) but were similar for U-KVSCT (0.19 ± 0.002 [SD] mm -1 ) and PCCT (0.21 ± [SD] 0.008 mm -1 ) scanner. For R-KVSCT and PCCT scanners, TTF at 50 % (f 50 ) values increased from 40 to 70 keV for both inserts. For U-KVSCT and DLCT scanners, similar f 50 values were found according to energy level for both inserts. For both contrast-enhanced lesions, d' values decreased from 40 to 70 keV for PCCT, DLCT and U-KVSCT scanners. For R-KVSCT scanner, d' values peaked at 60 keV. At 40 and 50 keV, the greatest d’ values were found with DLCT and PCCT scanners.
Conclusion |
At 40 or 50 keV, the best combined results (objective and subjective assessments) are obtained with DLCT and PCCT scanners.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Computed tomography, Dual-energy CT, Image quality, Photon-counting CT, Task-based image quality assessment
Abbreviations : CT, DECT, DLCT, DLR, DLSR, EID, IR, KVSCT, NPS, PCCT, PCD, RMSD, TTF, SAIR
Plan
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
