Low back pain and disability trajectories in primary care: a growth mixture modeling analysis - 05/12/25
, René J.F. Melis c, Sophie Pagen d, Robin Hak a, e, Miriam L. Haaksma f, g, Gert P. Westert a, Philip J. van der Wees a, J.Bart Staal a, hHighlights |
• | Two trajectories in the pain and disability courses are identified in primary care. |
• | People with low back pain who recover poorly in pain often also do so in disability. |
• | Higher pain, psychosocial factors, and longer complaint duration worsen recovery. |
Abstract |
Background |
People with low back pain are a heterogeneous group with diverse symptoms and recovery patterns, highlighting the need for a better understanding of trajectories toward either rapid resolution or chronicity with persistent disease burden.
Objectives |
The aim of this study is to identify clustering of pain and disability trajectories and predictors thereof in adults seeking physical therapy care for low back pain.
Methods |
People ( n =347) were followed for 12 months in a prospective cohort. Growth classes were identified using growth mixture modeling (GMM) separately for pain and disability. Pseudo-class method was used to calculate the odd ratios between the assigned growth class for pain and disability.
Results |
The best-fitting GMM identified two growth classes in both the pain and disability courses. One trajectory with people with moderate pain/disability at first visit that recovered and a second trajectory with people with moderate pain/disability at first visit that did not recover. People in the worst class for disability had higher odds of being the worst class for pain as well (OR 6.8, 95% CI 1.69-9.28). Predictors of class membership for the worst classes in pain and disability were longer duration of complaints (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02-1.46) for pain and higher baseline NPRS score (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09-1.52) and higher baseline STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) score (OR 5.49, 95% CI 1.69-9.28).
Conclusion |
The odds are high for people in the non-recovery class for disability to also be in the worst recovery class for pain. Longer duration of complaints, higher pain scores, and presence of more psychosocial factors were identified as predictors of slower recovery trajectories. People might benefit from tailored treatment based on these prognostic factors.
Registration |
Clinicaltrials.gov 109643; Ethics committee RadboudUMC 2020-6295
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Low back pain, Disability, Physical therapy, Growth mixture modeling
Abbreviations : BIC, BLRT, CI, GMM, LBP, LCGA, LMM, LMR, NPRS, ODI, OR, SBST, SD, SE
Plan
Vol 68 - N° 8
Article 102023- novembre 2025 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Social cognition and behavioral problems persist after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a longitudinal cohort study
- Lieke S. Jorna, Sara Khosdelazad, Sandra E. Rakers, Rob J.M. Groen, Ralf Koffijberg, Joke M. Spikman, Anne M. Buunk
- Effects of litigation on outcome after traumatic injury: A systematic review
- Jimmy Muong, Mélanie Cogné, Alexis Schnitzler, Philippe Azouvi
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?