Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened - 08/01/26
, Alexandra Beurton 1 , Jean-Louis Teboul 1 , Nello De Vita 1 , Danila Azzolina 3 , Rui Shi 1 , Arthur Pavot 1 , Xavier Monnet 1
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.
Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!
Abstract |
Background |
The end-expiratory occlusion (EEXPO) test detects preload responsiveness, but it is 15 s long and induces small changes in cardiac index (CI). It is doubtful whether the Starling bioreactance device, which averages CI over 24 s and refreshes the displayed value every 4 s (Starling-24.4), can detect the EEXPO-induced changes in CI (ΔCI). Our primary goal was to test whether this Starling device version detects preload responsiveness through EEXPO. We also tested whether shortening the averaging and refresh times to 8 s and one second, respectively, (Starling-8.1) improves the accuracy of the device in detecting preload responsiveness using EEXPO.
Methods |
In 42 mechanically ventilated patients, during a 15-s EEXPO, we measured ∆CI through calibrated pulse contour analysis (CI pulse , PiCCO2 device) and using the Starling device. For the latter, we considered both CI Starling-24.4 from the commercial version and CI Starling-8.1 derived from the raw data. For relative ∆CI Starling-24.4 and ∆CI Starling-8.1 during EEXPO, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) to detect preload responsiveness, defined as an increase in CI pulse ≥ 10% during passive leg raising (PLR). For both methods, the correlation coefficient vs. ∆CI pulse was calculated.
Results |
Twenty-six patients were preload responders and sixteen non preload-responders. The AUROC for ∆CI Starling-24.4 was significantly lower compared to ∆CI Starling-8.1 (0.680 ± 0.086 vs. 0.899 ± 0.049, respectively; p = 0.027). A significant correlation was observed between ∆CI Starling-8.1 and ∆CI pulse ( r = 0.42; p = 0.009), but not between ∆CI Starling-24.4 and ∆CI pulse . During PLR, both ∆CI Starling-24.4 and ∆CI Starling-8.1 reliably detected preload responsiveness.
Conclusions |
Shortening the averaging and refresh times of the bioreactance signal to 8 s and one second, respectively, increases the reliability of the Starling device in detection of EEXPO-induced ∆CI.
Trial registration: No. IDRCB:2018-A02825-50. Registered 13 December 2018.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Fluid, Cardiac index, Monitoring, Passive leg raising, Fluid challenge, Heart lung interactions
Plan
Vol 11 - N° 1
Article 133- 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Biotrauma during ultra-low tidal volume ventilation and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock: a randomized crossover clinical trial
- Laura Amado-Rodríguez, Cecilia Del Busto, Inés López-Alonso, Diego Parra, Juan Mayordomo-Colunga, Miguel Arias-Guillén, Rodrigo Albillos-Almaraz, Paula Martín-Vicente, Cecilia López-Martínez, Covadonga Huidobro, Luigi Camporota, Arthur S. Slutsky, Guillermo M. Albaiceta
- High-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trial
- Surat Tongyoo, Porntipa Tantibundit, Kiattichai Daorattanachai, Tanuwong Viarasilpa, Chairat Permpikul, Suthipol Udompanturak
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.