Adaptive support ventilation with IntelliSync versus pressure support ventilation for non-invasive ventilation in acute exacerbation of COPD: A feasibility randomized trial - 23/02/26

, Ritesh Agarwal, Valliappan Muthu, Sahajal Dhooria, Kuruswamy Thurai Prasad, Ashutosh Nath AggarwalAbstract |
Background |
While non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is recommended for managing acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), it has a 30–40% failure rate when delivered using pressure support ventilation (PSV). Adaptive support ventilation with IntelliSync (ASVi) synchronizes breath initiation and cycling to match patient's requirements. We conducted a feasibility study to inform design of a larger trial and compared NIV failure rates using PSV or ASVi in patients with AECOPD.
Materials and methods |
We conducted a single-center, randomized controlled trial from December 2023 to April 2025 in subjects with AECOPD. Subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive NIV using PSV or ASVi. The primary outcome was NIV failure, defined as the need for airway intubation. Key secondary outcomes included the asynchrony index and 28-day all-cause mortality.
Results |
We included 55 consecutive subjects with AECOPD (ASVi, n = 26; PSV, n = 29), with a mean age of 63 years. NIV failure occurred in15.4% (4/26) with ASVi versus 31% (9/29) with PSV, representing a 50% relative risk reduction (absolute difference 15.6%, 95% CI: −6.2%–37.5%, P = 0.17). Asynchrony index was similar between groups (22.6 ± 17.8 ASVi vs. 21.5 ± 16.7 PSV, P = 0.83). ASVi was associated with significantly greater patient comfort (P = 0.048) and shorter hospital stay (3.9 ± 2.9 vs 5.8 ± 4.0 days, P = 0.021).
Conclusion |
This study demonstrates that ASVi is safe, feasible to implement, and associated with improved patient comfort and significantly reduced hospital stay in AECOPD. The observed 50% relative reduction in NIV failure rates, although not statistically significant, represents a clinically meaningful effect that warrants evaluation in a larger trial.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | First trial of adaptive support ventilation with IntelliSync (ASVi) vs PSV for NIV in COPD exacerbations |
• | ASVi showed 50% lower NIV failure vs PSV (15.4% vs 31%), not statistically significant in this feasibility study |
• | Patients in the ASVi arm had greater comfort (p=0.048) and shorter stays (3.9 vs 5.8 days, p=0.021) vs PSV |
• | ASVi is safe, well-tolerated, and feasible in AECOPD; effect sizes support a larger multicenter trial |
Keywords : ASV, Ventilation, Respiratory failure, Airway intubation, Artificial airway
Plan
Vol 253
Article 108690- mars 2026 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
