Mapping pathways to professional support: The role of mentorship, coaching, and sponsorship in surgical careers - 06/03/26
, Camila R. Guetter b, c, Morgan Hopp d, Rachna Sridhar e, Chantal Reyna f, Charlotte Kvasnovsky g, Yangyang Ru Yu h, Asanthi Ratnasekera i, Catherine H. Davis jAbstract |
Background |
Mentorship, coaching, and sponsorship are critical for professional advancement in surgical careers. This study examines these different forms of support among surgeons and trainees.
Methods |
An electronic survey was developed and disseminated on social media and was hosted by the Association of Women Surgeons (AWS). Members and non-members of the AWS from diverse backgrounds, including trainees and students and those in academic and community practices were queried on various demographic and professional characteristics. The primary outcome of interest was access to mentorship, sponsorship and coaching. Chi-square, Fisher's exact tests, and logistic regression models were applied to analyze survey responses.
Results |
Of 93 respondents, 48 % reported knowing the difference between mentors, coaches, and sponsors. 65 % of participants reported having a mentor, 28 % a sponsor, and 17 % a coach. Community-based surgeons were less likely to have mentors compared to academic surgeons (OR 0.09, 95 % CI 0.01–0.69, p = 0.02). Administrative leaders were more likely to have sponsors (admin leaders 44.8 % vs. non admin 21.3 %, p = 0.02) and coaches (admin leaders 31 % vs. non admin 11.5 %, p = 0.02). Identifying people within one's organization and time constraints were the most common barriers to having that support.
Conclusions |
Efforts by institutions and surgical societies are needed to increase the availability of mentors, sponsors and coaches, particularly for community-based and early-career surgeons.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | Mentorship was common (65 %), but coaching (17 %) and sponsorship (28 %) were infrequent among respondents. |
• | Community-based physicians were significantly less likely to have access to mentorship compared to those in other settings, while those in academia were more likely to have sponsors and coaches. |
• | The majority of professional support was obtained informally; only 27 % of mentorships arose through formal programs. |
• | Surgeons with administrative roles were over twice as likely to have a coach or sponsor compared to peers without such roles. |
• | Time constraints and institutional limitations were the most frequently reported barriers to accessing these kinds of support. |
Keywords : Mentorship, Coaching, Sponsorship, Career development, Surgical education, Workforce equity, Gender concordance, Professional support networks, Academic surgery, Diversity in surgery, Surgery, Survey
Plan
| This article is part of a special issue entitled: AWS 2025 published in The American Journal of Surgery. |
Vol 254
Article 116711- avril 2026 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Time is valuable, people are too: Making the most of mentorship, coaching, and sponsorship
- Marquise D. Singleterry, Calista M. Harbaugh
- The general surgery match in the step 1 pass/fail era: Leveling the playing field or moving the goalpost?
- Carla N. Holcomb, Thomas H. Shoultz
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?