Protecting learner autonomy in dermatology: Ethics involved in non-indicated volunteer peer procedures - 17/04/26
Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2025.10.035
Janice Kim, BS a, Tarek Zieneldien, BS b, Sophia Ma, BS b, Jane M. Grant-Kels, MD c, d, ⁎ 
a Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan
b Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
c Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut
d Department of Dermatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
∗ Correspondence to: Jane M. Grant-Kels, MD, Department of Dermatology UCONN Health, 21 South Rd, Farmington, CT 06032 Department of Dermatology UCONN Health 21 South Rd Farmington CT 06032
Key words : artificial intelligence-assisted modules, coercion, dermatology education, Ethics, informed consent, peer procedures, power dynamics, power imbalance, resident autonomy, retribution, simulation-based training, volunteering
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.
| Funding sources: None. |
|
| Patient consent: Not applicable. |
|
| IRB approval status: Not applicable. |
© 2025
American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Vol 94 - N° 5
P. 1593-1594 - mai 2026 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Cryotherapy medicolegal liability claims amongst physicians in North America (1988-2025)
- Raquel Lazarowitz, Ghassan Barnawi, Mark Lazarowitz, Vincent Piguet
- Ethical considerations in interpreting nonverbal communication in dermatology
- Isabella J. Tan, Tarek Zieneldien, Sophia Ma, Jane M. Grant-Kels
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?