Higher dermatologist density is associated with lower proportions of late-stage melanoma: An ecological study of the State Cancer Profiles - 07/06/26
, Joshua Dan, MD, Keyvan Nouri, MD, MBAAbstract |
Background |
Cutaneous melanoma with regional or distant metastases (late-stage) is associated with worse survival than localized disease. Access to dermatologic care varies widely across the United States and may influence the stage at which melanoma is diagnosed.
Objective |
To examine the association between regional dermatologist density and the proportion of melanoma cases diagnosed at late-stage.
Methods |
This national ecological study used the State Cancer Profiles and Area Health Resource File data to assess proportions of late-stage melanoma and dermatologist counts per 100,000 population across National Cancer Institute Health Service Areas (HSAs) from 2017 to 2021.
Results |
Five hundred fifty-seven HSAs met inclusion criteria. In multivariable analysis, higher dermatologist density was associated with significantly lower proportions of late-stage melanoma diagnosis. Compared with HSAs with no dermatologists, the odds of late-stage melanoma were reduced by 11% for > 0-1 dermatologists per 100,000 population (OR = 0.89, P = .034), 11% for > 1-2 (OR = 0.89, P = .020), 16% for > 2–4 (OR = 0.84, P < .001), and 20% for > 4 (OR = 0.80, P < .001).
Limitations |
The ecological design limits causal inference and HSAs with low case counts were censored.
Conclusion |
Greater dermatologist density is associated with a lower proportion of melanoma cases diagnosed at a late-stage, underscoring the importance of improving access to specialty care.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : access to care, cancer staging, dermatologist density, early detection, ecological study, geographic disparities, health service areas, health services accessibility, late-stage melanoma, melanoma, physician workforce, skin cancer, United States
Abbreviations used : AHRF, HSA, HRSA, IRB, OR, PCP, SEER, US
Plan
| Funding sources: None. |
|
| Patient consent: Not applicable. |
|
| IRB approval status: This article was exempt from IRB approval. |
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
