How do sleep outcomes differ between children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and peers without diabetes? A meta-analysis and meta-regression - 02/07/26
, Jacinto Muñoz-Pardeza a, Jorge Olivares-Arancibia b, Rodrigo Yáñez-Sepúlveda c, d, Ignacio Hormazábal-Aguayo a, e, Juan Hurtado-Almonacid f, Yasmin Ezzatvar g, hAbstract |
This study examined differences in sleep duration (primary outcome) and sleep quality (secondary outcomes) between children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and peers without diabetes. We searched three databases. Eligible studies included participants aged 3–20 years, with and without type 1 diabetes, reporting total sleep time and/or other sleep parameters. Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were performed. Seventeen studies were included (956 with type 1 diabetes; 10,893 controls; mean age 12.7 years; 52.6% female). Total sleep time varied by assessment method, but none of the modality-specific pooled estimates were statistically significant. Actigraphy showed no clear difference (Mean Difference [MD] = −7.30 min/night, 95% CI −19.66 to 5.06; I 2 = 19.58%); polysomnography suggested shorter sleep in type 1 diabetes with wide confidence intervals (MD = −19.56 min/night, 95% CI −50.39 to 11.26; I 2 = 36.06%); questionnaires tended to report shorter self-reported sleep with substantial heterogeneity (MD = −21.03 min/night, 95% CI −46.79 to 4.72; I 2 = 86.5%). Sleep efficiency from actigraphy was slightly lower in type 1 diabetes (MD = −0.52%, 95% CI −0.94 to −0.11; I 2 = 0.31%). Other polysomnography-derived sleep variables showed no between-group differences. In conclusion, we found no robust and consistent evidence of differences in sleep duration or most objective sleep parameters between children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and peers without diabetes across assessment methods.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, Sleep quality, Sleep health, Polysomnography, Actigraphy
Plan
Vol 88
Article 102291- août 2026 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
