>Over a century of orthodontic research: A bibliometric and scientometric analysis of growth, citation impact, and structural evolution - 29/10/26
, Marco Serafin 2, Alberto Caprioglio 2, 3Highlights |
• | The absolute slope of annual output rose over 25-fold after the 1996 changepoint. |
• | Citation impact is highly skewed: median 2, 35.7% uncited, Gini 0.794. |
• | Journal concentration collapsed; 95% of 2024 output spans 460 venues. |
• | The USA leads by whole counting; India was the top annual producer in 2021–2024. |
• | Older cohorts carry more citations; date-restricted searches may omit relevant work. |
Summary |
Introduction |
Orthodontic research has grown for more than a century, but its evidence base has not been examined across its full history. We evaluated its evolution in publication growth, citation impact, journal distribution, geographic contribution, and international collaboration.
Methods |
We froze an OpenAlex topic-indexed corpus (“Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics”) on December 31, 2025, and, after removing pre-1900 metadata artefacts, analysed 46,265 records from 1900 to 2025; in a two-rater manual check of a random sample, 92.4% of records were genuinely orthodontic (precision; recall not assessed). We assessed growth, structural transitions, citation inequality, field-weighted citation impact (FWCI), publishing concentration, country-level output, language, and collaboration.
Results |
Output accelerated after a structural changepoint in 1996: the absolute slope of annual output (records added per year) increased more than 25-fold while the proportional growth rate remained broadly stable; 86.5% of the corpus dates from 1996 onward. Citation impact was skewed (median 2 citations, 35.7% uncited, Gini coefficient 0.794). Annual mean FWCI exceeded 1.0 from 2022 onward, although over short citation windows. Among venue-resolved records, the annual Herfindahl-Hirschman Index fell from 920 in 1990 to 97 in 2024, and 95% of the 2024 output was spread across 460 venues (1455 across all years). Among the 62.5% of records with resolved affiliations, the United States led cumulative output under whole counting (5265 papers), followed by Brazil (3360) and India (2757); India led annual output in 2021–2024. Internationally co-authored papers were associated with higher citation impact than single-country papers in every period (median FWCI 0.90 versus 0.47).
Conclusion |
Orthodontic research is now predominantly post-1990s, globally redistributed, dispersed across a large journal ecosystem, and highly asymmetric in citation impact. These results provide a quantitative baseline; they are consistent with, but do not by themselves establish, implications for literature retrieval, journal selection, and collaborative research strategy.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Bibliometrics, Orthodontics, Citation analysis, Scientific output, Publication trends, Geographic distribution
Plan
Vol 25 - N° 1
Article 101257- mars 2027 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Association of miR-29, miR-155, MMP-9, and MT1-MMP expression with lateral incisor root resorption adjacent to unilaterally impacted maxillary canines: A CBCT-based cross-sectional split-mouth study
- Muralidharan R, Reema M. Rao, Pradeep V. Samir, Pradeep Subbaiah, Alok Dubey, Rahul Tiwari, Seema Gupta, Manish Sharma
- Self-reported attitudes toward standardized oral hygiene outcome assessment in fixed orthodontic treatment: An exploratory cross-sectional implementation survey distributed through professional networks in Egypt and Saudi Arabia
- Fadi Mohammed Altawil, Suhail Hassan Alghalban, Mohammed Yehia Almanirawi, Sameh Mohammed M. Alsharif
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?