Post-treatment surveillance and management of recurrent cervical cancer - A review from the french cervical cancer guidelines group - 04/11/26

and the
members from the FRENCH CERVICAL CANCER GUIDELINES GROUP 1
, Lobna Ouldamer j, Cyrille Huchon k, Pauline Asseeva l, Henri Azaïs m, Sofiane Bendifallah n, Jean-Luc Brun o, Geoffroy Canlorbe p, Cyrus Chargari q, Pauline Chauvet r, Abel Cordoba s, Hélène Courcier t, Yohann Dabi u, Marion de Berti j, Caroline Diguisto j, Eva Fuss v, Thomas Gaillard w, Tristan Gauthier x, Witold Gertych y, Laurence Gladieff z, Olivier Graesslin aa, Yohan Kerbage ab, Martin Koskas t, Enora Laas w, Aymeline Lacorre x, Vincent Lavoué aj, Lise Lecointre v, Fabrice Lecuru ac, François Margueritte x, Alejandra Martinez ad, Paul-Jean Maternowski o, Patrice Mathevet ae, af, Imane Menouer aa, Camille Mimoun k, Anthony Moureau aj, Antoine Netter i, Charles-André Philip ag, Pascal Rousset ak, Claire Sanson ah, Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara ai, Cyril Touboul u, Jean Levêque ajAbstract |
Objective |
To review the available evidence on post-treatment follow-up and recurrence management after cervical cancer.
Methods |
We conducted a narrative review of the literature on surveillance modalities, and the management of pelvic and nodal recurrences.
Results |
Most recurrences occur within three years of treatment, but the survival benefit of detection before symptom onset remains unproven. After fertility-sparing surgery, HPV testing is sensitive for detecting asymptomatic pelvic recurrence. After hysterectomy, most recurrences are symptomatic, and clinical examination has a higher diagnostic yield than HPV testing or vaginal vault cytology. After concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), persistent HPV infection is associated with an increased recurrence risk, but its limited specificity and the absence of a validated HPV-based surveillance strategy restrict its clinical utility. MRI and FDG PET/CT are useful for response assessment and investigation of suspected recurrence, but evidence supporting routine imaging of asymptomatic patients is lacking. Intensive follow-up schedules have not improved recurrence detection or survival. Evidence on recurrence management is predominantly retrospective. Pelvic recurrences after primary surgery have been treated with CRT, supplemented by brachytherapy for vaginal involvement. In selected patients with central pelvic recurrence after CRT, complete surgical resection may provide prolonged survival, but carries substantial morbidity. Nodal recurrences outside previously irradiated fields have been treated with CRT.
Conclusion |
Available evidence supports a predominantly clinical, treatment-adapted follow-up. The survival benefit of intensive surveillance, routine imaging, or detecting asymptomatic recurrence remains uncertain. Recurrence management requires individualized multidisciplinary assessment based on disease extent, disease-free interval, and previous treatments.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Cervical cancer, Follow-up, HPV test, MRI, PET scanner, Recurrence
Plan
Vol 55 - N° 10
Article 103315- décembre 2026 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
