Physiologic decrease of ventilatory response to exercise in the second decade of life in healthy children - 06/08/11
, Dolf Odendaal, MSc, Sachin Khambadkone, MD, Graham Derrick, MDRésumé |
Background |
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing is increasingly used in children with congenital heart defects. Because of changes related to growth, the interpretation of exercise test results heavily relies on the presence of normative data. There is growing interest in the assessment of the ventilatory response to exercise in children with congenital heart disease, but normative data are lacking.
Methods |
We studied 243 consecutive children (age, 13.2 ± 2.1 years; 128 boys) with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. All children had normal clinical examination and echocardiograms. In all children, the slope of the relationship between minute ventilation and carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2 slope) was calculated using both only data until the respiratory compensation point (VE/VCO2RC) and using data until peak exercise (VE/VCO2Peak).
Results |
The exercise test was maximal in all children (peak respiratory exchange ratio, 1.2 ± 0.1). For all the cohorts, VE/VCO2Peak slope was 28.2 ± 3.7; and VE/VCO2RC slope was 24.5 ± 3.0, whereas peak oxygen uptake was 94.6% ± 14.0% of predicted value. Baseline spirometric function was normal in all children (vital capacity, 100% ± 14% and forced expired volume in the first second 97% ± 13% of predicted). From the age of 10 to 16 years, we observed a progressive decrease in both VE/VCO2Peak and VE/VCO2RC slopes (−0.833 and −0.705 per each year), with the highest reduction observed in boys. Gender-specific percentiles for both VE/VCO2Peak and VE/VCO2RC slopes were constructed.
Conclusion |
Ventilatory response to exercise expressed as VE/VCO2 slope seems to decrease progressively in the second decade of life. Because of age-related changes, interpretation of VE/VCO2 slopes in this age range should be based on the reported percentiles rather than on the absolute values.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 161 - N° 6
P. 1214-1219 - juin 2011 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
