Gene expression analysis in predicting the effectiveness of insect venom immunotherapy - 07/08/11
, Marcel Bruinenberg, PhD c, d, Jan de Monchy, MD, PhD b, Cisca Wijmenga, PhD c, Mathieu Platteel, BSc c, Ewa Jassem, MD, PhD a, Joanne N.G. Oude Elberink, MD, PhD bAbstract |
Background |
Venom immunotherapy (VIT) enables longtime prevention of insect venom allergy in the majority of patients. However, in some, the risk of a resystemic reaction increases after completion of treatment. No reliable factors predicting individual lack of efficacy of VIT are currently available.
Objective |
To determine the use of gene expression profiles to predict the long-term effect of VIT.
Methods |
Whole genome gene expression analysis was performed on RNA samples from 46 patients treated with VIT divided into 3 groups: (1) patients who achieved and maintained long-term protection after VIT, (2) patients in whom insect venom allergy relapsed, and (3) patients still in the maintenance phase of VIT.
Results |
Among the 48.071 transcripts analyzed, 1401 showed a >2 fold difference in gene expression (P < .05); 658 genes (47%) were upregulated and 743 (53%) downregulated. Forty-three transcripts still show significant differences in expression after correction for multiple testing; 12 of 43 genes (28%) were upregulated and 31 of 43 genes (72%) downregulated. A naive Bayes prediction model demonstrated a gene expression pattern characteristic of effective VIT that was present in all patients with successful VIT but absent in all subjects with failure of VIT. The same gene expression profile was present in 88% of patients in the maintenance phase of VIT.
Conclusion |
Gene expression profiling might be a useful tool to assess the long-term effectiveness of VIT. The analysis of differently expressed genes confirms the involvement of immunologic pathways described previously but also indicates novel factors that might be relevant for allergen tolerance.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : Insect venom allergy, venom immunotherapy, gene expression, microarray assessment, prediction of treatment efficacy
Abbreviations used : CLDN1, IVA, MAPK, PRLR, SLC16A4, SNX33, STAT, TWIST2, VIT
Plan
| Supported by the Foundation for Polish Science and a grant from the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education, no. N402085934. |
|
| Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: J. de Monchy has received research support from ALK-Abelló and Novartis. The rest of the authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest. |
Vol 125 - N° 5
P. 1092-1097 - mai 2010 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
