S'abonner

Prescribing practices and asthma control with hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone and fluticasone: A real-world observational study - 07/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.06.040 
David Price, FRCGP a, b, , Richard J. Martin, MD c, Neil Barnes, MBBS, FRCP d, Paul Dorinsky, MD e, Elliot Israel, MD f, Nicolas Roche, MD, PhD g, Alison Chisholm, MSc b, Elizabeth V. Hillyer, DVM b, Linda Kemp, BSc b, Amanda J. Lee, PhD h, Julie von Ziegenweidt b, Gene Colice, MD i
a Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom 
b Research in Real Life, Norwich, United Kingdom 
c National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo 
d London Chest Hospital, Barts and the London NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom 
e Teva Global Respiratory Research & Development, Horsham, Pa 
f Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass 
g Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France 
h Section of Population Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom 
i Washington Hospital Center and George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 

Reprint requests: David Price, FRCGP, Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Health Centre, Westburn Rd, Aberdeen AB25 2AY, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Background

Long-term randomized trials comparing asthma outcomes between inhaled corticosteroids in real-world populations are lacking. As such, rigorously conducted observational studies to complement the findings of randomized trials are needed.

Objective

We sought to compare asthma-related outcomes over 1 year as recorded in a large primary care database for patients aged 5 to 60 years receiving a first prescription (initiation population) or dose increase (step-up population) of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-beclomethasone or fluticasone.

Methods

We used a retrospective matched cohort study in which patients were matched on baseline demographic and disease severity measures. Coprimary outcomes were asthma control (a composite measure comprising no unplanned visit or hospitalization for asthma, oral corticosteroids, or antibiotics for lower respiratory tract infection) and exacerbation rate.

Results

More than 80% of patients in each population achieved asthma control; 10% and 16% of patients in the initiation and step-up populations, respectively, received add-on or combination therapy during the year. Fluticasone was prescribed at significantly higher doses than HFA-beclomethasone for both populations (P ≤ .001). In the initiation population (n = 1319 in each cohort) the adjusted odds ratio for achieving asthma control with HFA-beclomethasone was 1.30 (95% CI, 1.02-1.65) relative to fluticasone. In the step-up population (cohorts: n = 250) the adjusted odds ratio for achieving asthma control with HFA-beclomethasone was 1.22 (95% CI, 0.66-2.26). Exacerbation rates were similar between cohorts.

Conclusions

In a real-world setting patients receiving HFA-beclomethasone had a similar or better chance of achieving asthma control at lower prescribed doses than with fluticasone.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : Asthma, database, fluticasone, hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone, inhaled corticosteroid, observational study

Abbreviations used : GPRD, HFA, ICS, MDI, UK


Plan


 Access to data from the General Practice Research Database was funded by Merck & Co, Inc, and the analysis was funded by Teva Pharmaceuticals Limited.
 Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: D. Price is a consultant for Aerocrine, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dey Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Merck Generics, Sharpe and Dohme, Novartis, Schering-Plough, Teva, Bayer (antibiotic study design); has spoken at meetings sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Sharpe and Dohme, Pfizer, Schering-Plough, Altana Pharma, and Chiesi; has received research support from UK National Health Centre, Aerocrine, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Sharpe and Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Schering-Plough, and Teva. R. J. Martin is a lecturer and consultant for Teva; is a consultant for AstraZeneca, Novartis/Genentech, Schering, Cypress BioScience, Phase to Phase and Common Health, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)/National Institutes of Health (NIH); and has received research support from the NHLBI/NIH. N. Barnes has provided lectured consultancy for GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Boehringer, Teva, and Nycomed and has received research support from GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Schering-Plough. E. Israel is a consultant for Abbott, Amgen, Cowen & Co, GlaxoSmithKline, Icagen, MedImmune, Merck, NewMentor, NKT Therapeutics, Ono Pharmaceuticals US, Pulmatrix, Schering-Plough, and Teva Specialty Pharmaceuticals and has received research support from Aerovance, Amgen, Ception Therapeutics, Genentech, Icagen, Johnson & Johnson, MedImmune, National Institutes of Health, and Novartis. E. V. Hillyer has done freelance writing for Merck, Aerocrine, and Teva Sante (France). G. Colice has served as a consultant/speaker for Teva, Dey, BT, GlaxoSmithKline, Vakera, Skye Pharma, and MedImmune and has served as an expert witness on the topic of long-acting β-agonists. The rest of the authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.


© 2010  American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 126 - N° 3

P. 511 - septembre 2010 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Randomized controlled trial of adherence with single or combination inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β-agonist inhaler therapy in asthma
  • Kyle Perrin, Mathew Williams, Meme Wijesinghe, Kate James, Mark Weatherall, Richard Beasley
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Symptom-pattern phenotype and pulmonary function in preschool wheezers
  • Samatha Sonnappa, Cristina M. Bastardo, Angela Wade, Sejal Saglani, Sheila A. McKenzie, Andrew Bush, Paul Aurora

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.