Construct and Differential Item Functioning in the Assessment of Prescription Opioid Use Disorders Among American Adolescents - 07/08/11

, Christopher L. Ringwalt, Dr.P.H., Chongming Yang, Ph.D., Bryce B. Reeve, Ph.D., Jeng-Jong Pan, Ph.D., Dan G. Blazer, M.D., Ph.D.Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Abstract |
Objectives |
To examine the psychometric properties of diagnostic criteria for prescription analgesic opioid use disorders (OUDs) and to identify background predictors of a latent continuum for OUD liability.
Method |
Data were drawn from the adolescent sample of the 2006 National Survey of Drug Use and Health. Item response theory (IRT) and multiple indicators-multiple causes methods were used to examine DSM-IV criteria for OUDs in a subsample of adolescents who reported nonmedical prescription opioid use in the past year (N = 1,290).
Results |
Among nonmedical users of prescription opioids, the criteria of OUDs were arrayed along a single continuum of severity. All abuse criteria were endorsed at a severity level higher than D1 (tolerance) and D5 (time spent) but lower than D3 (taking larger amounts) and D4 (inability to cut down). Differential item functioning in reports of dependence symptoms across adolescents’ sex and race/ethnicity were identified: withdrawal, time spent, and continued use despite medical or psychological problems. Adjusting for the effects of differential item functioning and the demographic variables examined, female subjects were more likely than male subjects to exhibit a higher level of OUD liability.
Conclusions |
Study findings do not support the DSM-IVs current hierarchical distinction between abuse of and dependence on prescription opioids. Abuse symptoms in adolescents are not necessarily less severe than those of dependence. There is evidence of some differential item functioning in the assessment of OUDs.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key Words : DSM-IV, item response theory, nosology, opioid use disorders
Plan
| This work was supported by research grants from the U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health to Dr. Wu (DA019623 and DA019901). The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research provided the public use data files for National Survey on Drug Use and Health, which was sponsored by the Office of Applied Studies of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and not of any sponsoring agency. Supplemental digital content for this article can be found online only. See text for specific links. The authors thank Amanda McMillan for editorial assistance. |
Vol 48 - N° 5
P. 563-572 - mai 2009 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
