Automated External Defibrillators and Simulated In-Hospital Cardiac Arrests - 08/08/11
, Larry S. Jefferson, MD b, E. O'Brian Smith, PhD c, Mark A. Ward, MD d, Antonio R. Mott, MD aRésumé |
Objective |
To test the hypothesis that pediatric residents would have shorter time to attempted defibrillation using automated external defibrillators (AEDs) compared with manual defibrillators (MDs).
Study design |
A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of AEDs versus MDs was performed. Pediatric residents responded to a simulated in-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest and were randomized to using either an AED or MD. The primary end point was time to attempted defibrillation.
Results |
Sixty residents, 21 (35%) interns, were randomized to 2 groups (AED = 30, MD = 30). Residents randomized to the AED group had a significantly shorter time to attempted defibrillation [median, 60 seconds (interquartile range, 53 to 71 seconds)] compared with those randomized to the MD group [median, 103 seconds (interquartile range, 68 to 288 seconds)] (P < .001). All residents in the AED group attempted defibrillation at <5 minutes compared with 23 (77%) in the MD group (P = .01).
Conclusions |
AEDs improve the time to attempted defibrillation by pediatric residents in simulated cardiac arrests. Further studies are needed to help determine the role of AEDs in pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrests.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Abbreviations : AED, AHA, MD, PALS, VF
Plan
| The authors declare no conflicts of interest. |
|
| Clinical Trial Registration No. NCT00640354. |
Vol 154 - N° 5
P. 672 - mai 2009 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
