A Single-Institution Comparison Between Radical Perineal and Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy on Perioperative and Pathological Outcomes for Obese Men: An Analysis of the Duke Prostate Center Database - 09/08/11
, Leon L. Sun a, Philipp Dahm a, c, Judd W. Moul a, John Madden b, Tong J. Gan d, Stephen J. Freedland a, b, c
Reprint requests: Nicholas J. Fitzsimons, M.D., Division of Urologic Surgery, Box 3707 DUMC, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710.Résumé |
Objectives |
To examine the association between body mass index (BMI) and operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and adverse pathologic features in patients undergoing either radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) or radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).
Methods |
We performed a retrospective analysis of 1006 patients treated with RPP or RRP at our institution from 1988 to 2005. Operative times and EBL were compared among BMI groups for both RPP and RRP. The odds ratio of positive surgical margins was estimated for the BMI categories using logistic regression after adjusting for preoperative and pathologic characteristics.
Results |
Increased BMI was significantly associated with increased operative time and EBL for men treated with either RPP or RRP (all P ≤0.03), though the associations were weak (all Spearman r ≤0.19). After adjusting for multiple clinical preoperative characteristics, higher BMI was associated with positive surgical margins among all patients (P trend <0.001). The association between obesity and surgical margins remained after adjusting for pathologic characteristics (P trend = 0.001) with similar patterns among RRP (P trend = 0.03) and RPP (P trend = 0.01) patients.
Conclusions |
For mildly obese men, both RPP and RRP are associated with a similarly increased risk of higher EBL, longer operative time, and positive surgical margins. These data do not provide evidence to suggest that RPP should be preferred over RRP for mildly obese men. Further study is needed among men with a very high BMI.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Supported by the Division of Urologic Surgery and Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine; Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program (S.J.F.), and the American Urological Association Foundation Astellas Rising Star in Urology Award (S.J.F.). Views and opinions of, and endorsements by the author(s) do not reflect those of the U.S. Army or the Department of Defense |
Vol 70 - N° 6
P. 1146-1151 - décembre 2007 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Prostate Cancer Laterality Does Not Predict Prostate-Specific Antigen Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
- Vladimir Mouraviev, Leon Sun, John F. Madden, Janice M. Mayes, Judd W. Moul, Thomas J. Polascik
- Inguinal Hernia After Radical Perineal Prostatectomy: Comparison with the Retropubic Approach
- Akio Matsubara, Tatsuaki Yoneda, Takahisa Nakamoto, Satoshi Maruyama, Syuntaro Koda, Keisuke Goto, Jun Teishima, Hiroaki Shiina, Mikio Igawa, Tsuguru Usui
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?