Outcome of Renal Transplantation with Multiple Versus Single Renal Arteries After Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy: A Comparative Study - 09/08/11
, Arvind P. Ganpule, Rahul Gupta, Manohar ThimmegowdaRésumé |
Objectives |
To compare donor morbidity and recipient outcomes in patients with a single artery versus multiple arteries undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.
Methods |
A total of 303 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were performed. Data from the group with multiple arteries (n = 27) (group I) were compared with those from the groups with single renal artery (n = 245) (group IIA) and early branching renal artery resulting in two artery recipient anastomoses (n = 31) (group IIB), in terms of donor and recipient outcomes.
Results |
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was technically successful in all 303 patients without need for open conversion. The graft retrieval time was higher in group I and group IIB compared with group IIA (3.9 ± 1.4 and 3.9 ± 0.8 versus 3.5 ± 1.0 minutes). Similarly, warm ischemia time was significantly higher in groups I and IIB versus group IIA (7.2 ± 1.9 and 6.7 ± 1.9 versus 5.6 ± 1.8 minutes). Creatinine level at day 1 was higher in group I compared with group IIA (2.4 ± 1.4 versus 1.9 ± 0.7 mg/dL). However, there was no significant difference in creatinine levels at 1 month and 1 year among the three groups. Overall graft survival in groups I, IIA, and IIB was 92%, 94.4%, and 94%, respectively.
Conclusions |
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in the presence of multiple renal arteries is feasible and safe. Additionally, long-term graft survival and graft function at 1 month and 1 year are not adversely impacted by the presence of multiple renal arteries in grafts procured laparoscopically.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 69 - N° 5
P. 824-827 - mai 2007 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
