Comparing two methods of measuring legislation compliance among indoor tanning facilities - 09/08/11
, Susan I. Woodruff, PhD a, George E. Belch, PhD b, Minal R. Patel, MPH aSan Diego, California
Abstract |
Background |
Accurate measurement of compliance by tanning facilities to indoor tanning legislation is important.
Objective |
This study compared a telephone-based measurement procedure with a face-to-face visit.
Methods |
Indoor tanning facilities (N = 115) in San Diego County, California, were contacted by two adolescents posing as prospective customers using each method. Two compliance variables were assessed: number of times one can tan during 1 week and written parental consent for minors.
Results |
Facility compliance with the frequency variable by face-to-face and telephone was 25.5% and 17.5%, respectively. These rates for the parental consent variable were 73.3% and 80.8%, respectively. Percent agreement between data collection methods was 71.3% for compliance with the frequency recommendation and 76.3% for parental consent regulation. Although traditional statistical tests indicated poor concordance, an alternative test indicated good concordance.
Limitations |
Levels of concordance for the confederates differed.
Conclusion |
Telephone assessment of compliance is fairly comparable with the more labor-intensive, face-to-face assessment.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute: R01CA93532 and K05CA10051. Conflicts of interest: None identified. |
Vol 54 - N° 3
P. 433-439 - mars 2006 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
