Increased epithelial gaps in the small intestines of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: density matters - 11/08/11
Reprint requests: Julia J. Liu, MD, Division of Gastroenterology, 1–10 Zeidler Ledcor Centre, University of Alberta Campus, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2X8Résumé |
Background |
Epithelial gaps created by shedding of epithelial cells in the small intestine can be visualized by using confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE). The density of epithelial gaps in the small bowels of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and controls without IBD is unknown.
Objective |
To determine whether the epithelial gap density in patients with IBD is different from that in controls.
Design |
Prospective, controlled, cohort study.
Setting |
A tertiary-care referral center.
Patients |
This study involved patients with IBD and control patients without IBD undergoing colonoscopy.
Intervention |
Probe-based CLE (pCLE) was used to image the terminal ileum.
Main Outcome Measurements |
The primary outcome of the study was gap density, defined as the total number of gaps per 1000 cells counted in adequately imaged villi by using pCLE. The pCLE images were blindly reviewed, and the number of epithelial gaps and cells were manually counted. The secondary outcomes were correlation of gap density with disease activity, location, and severity of clinical disease.
Results |
There were 30 controls and 28 patients with IBD. Of the patients with IBD, 16 had Crohn's disease, and 12 had ulcerative colitis. The median epithelial gap densities for controls and patients with IBD were 18 and 61 gaps/1000 cells, respectively (P < .001). Gap density did not correlate with disease activity. Patients with ulcerative pan-colitis tended toward gap densities lower than those of patients with limited colitis (32 versus 97 gaps/1000 cells, P = .06). Patients with IBD with severe clinical disease also had lower median gap densities (37 vs 90 gaps/1000 cells, P = .04).
Limitations |
A single-center study.
Conclusion |
The epithelial gap density was significantly increased in patients with IBD compared with controls. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT00988273.)
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Abbreviations : CLE, pCLE, IBD, TNF, TNF-⍺
Plan
| DISCLOSURE: This work was supported in part by a grant to J. Liu from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research/Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and a grant to R. Fedorak from the Canada Foundation for Innovation. No other financial relationships relevant to this publication were disclosed. |
|
| If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Liu at julia.liu@ualberta.ca. |
Vol 73 - N° 6
P. 1174-1180 - juin 2011 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Pancreaticobiliary complications after composite visceral transplantation: incidence, risk, and management strategies
- Georgios I. Papachristou, Kareem M. Abu-Elmagd, Geoffry Bond, Guilherme Costa, George V. Mazariegos, Michael K. Sanders, Adam Slivka
- Prospective, randomized comparison of two small-bowel capsule endoscopy systems in patients with obscure GI bleeding
- Mathieu Pioche, Jean-Louis Gaudin, Bernard Filoche, Philippe Jacob, Hervé Lamouliatte, Marie-George Lapalus, Clotilde Duburque, Ulrikka Chaput, Emmanuel Ben Soussan, Jacques Daudet, Romain Tournan, Marianne Gaudric, Joel Edery, Christophe Cellier, Pierre-Nicolas Halluin, Jean-Christophe Saurin, French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED)
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?