Implementing composite quality metrics for bipolar disorder: towards a more comprehensive approach to quality measurement - 11/08/11
, Carrie Farmer Teh, Ph.D. c, Deborah Welsh, M.S. a, Harold Alan Pincus, M.D. c, d, Elaine Lasky, R.N. e, Brian Perron, Ph.D. a, f, Mark S. Bauer, M.D. gAbstract |
Objective |
We implemented a set of processes of care measures for bipolar disorder that reflect psychosocial, patient preference and continuum of care approaches to mental health, and examined whether veterans with bipolar disorder receive care concordant with these practices.
Method |
Data from medical record reviews were used to assess key processes of care for 433 VA mental health outpatients with bipolar disorder. Both composite and individual processes of care measures were operationalized.
Results |
Based on composite measures, 17% had documented assessment of psychiatric symptoms (e.g., psychotic, hallucinatory), 28% had documented patient treatment preferences (e.g., reasons for treatment discontinuation), 56% had documented substance abuse and psychiatric comorbidity assessment, and 62% had documentation of adequate cardiometabolic assessment. No-show visits were followed up 20% of the time, and monitoring of weight gain was noted in only 54% of the patient charts. In multivariate analyses, history of homelessness (OR=1.61; 95% CI=1.05–2.46) and nonwhite race (OR=1.74; 95%CI=1.02–2.98) were associated with documentation of psychiatric symptoms and comorbidities, respectively.
Conclusions |
Only half of patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder received care in accordance with clinical practice guidelines. High-quality treatment of bipolar disorder includes not only adherence to treatment guidelines but also patient-centered care processes.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Mood disorders–bipolar, Quality of care, Quality improvement, Co-occurring conditions
Plan
| ☆ | This work was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service (IIR 02-283) and by the National Institute of Mental Health (MH 74509; MH 79994, T32 MH19986). The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review or approval of the manuscript. All authors warrant having no actual or perceived conflicts of interest — financial or nonfinancial — in the procedures described in this manuscript. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs. |
Vol 32 - N° 6
P. 636-643 - novembre 2010 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
