Optimization of initial energy for cardioversion of atrial tachyarrhythmias with biphasic shocks - 11/08/11
, Christine Gstrein, MD, Thomas Winter, MD, Eduard Zeindlhofer, MD, Kurt Höllinger, MD, Michael Mori, MD, Alexandra Schiller, MD, Andreas Winter, MD, Helmut Geiger, MD, Peter Siostrzonek, MDAbstract |
Objective |
Recommendations for optimal first-shock energies with biphasic waveforms are conflicting. We evaluated prospectively the relation between type and duration of atrial tachyarrhythmias and the probability of successful cardioversion with a specific biphasic shock waveform to develop recommendations for the initial energy setting aiming at the lowest total cumulative energy with 2 or less consecutive shocks.
Methods |
We analyzed 453 consecutive patients undergoing their first transthoracic electrical cardioversion, including 358 attempts for atrial fibrillation (AF) and 95 attempts for atrial flutter (AFL) or atrial tachycardia (AT). A step-up protocol with a truncated exponential biphasic waveform starting at 50 J was used. Total cumulative energies were estimated under the assumption of a 2-tiered escalating shock protocol with different initial energy settings and a “rescue shock” of 250 J for AFL/AT or 360 J for AF. The initial energy setting leading to the lowest total cumulative energy was regarded as the optimal first-shock level.
Results |
Cardioversion was successful in 448 patients (cumulative efficacy, 99 %). In patients with AFL/AT, the lowest total cumulative energy was attained with an initial energy setting of 50 J. In patients with AF, lowest values were achieved with an initial energy of 100 J for arrhythmia durations of 2 days or less and an initial energy of 150 J for arrhythmia durations of more than 2 days.
Conclusion |
We recommend an initial energy setting of 50 J in patients with AFL/AT, of 100 J in patients with AF 2 days or less, and of 150 J with AF more than 2 days.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| ☆ | This study was supported by the Medizinische Gesellschaft für Oberösterreich, Linz, Austria. |
Vol 28 - N° 2
P. 159-165 - février 2010 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
