S'abonner

A randomized, open-label trial of continuous versus interrupted etanercept therapy in the treatment of psoriasis - 12/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.09.002 
Angela Moore, MD a, , Kenneth B. Gordon, MD b, Sewon Kang, MD c, Alice Gottlieb, MD, PhD d, Bruce Freundlich, MD e, H. Amy Xia, PhD f, Seth R. Stevens, MD f
a From Arlington Center for Dermatology, Arlington 
b Evanston Northwestern Healthcare and Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Skokie 
c University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 
d Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston 
e Wyeth Research, Collegeville 
f Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks 

Reprint requests: Angela Moore, Arlington Center for Dermatology, 711 E Lamar, Suite 200, Arlington, TX 76011.

Arlington, Texas; Skokie, Illinois; Ann Arbor, Michigan; Boston, Massachusetts; Collegeville, Pennsylvania; and Thousand Oaks, California

Abstract

Background

Although etanercept is used as a continuous therapy for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, intermittent use may be necessary in some instances.

Objective

In this randomized, open-label study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of continuous versus interrupted etanercept therapy.

Methods

All patients received uninterrupted etanercept 50 mg twice weekly during the first 12 weeks, followed by either continuous (n = 1272) or interrupted (n = 1274) etanercept 50 mg once weekly in the next 12 weeks. The primary effectiveness end point was the proportion of responders (those who achieved a Physician’s Global Assessment [PGA] score ≤2 and improvement from baseline) at week 24. Secondary end points included the PGA “clear/almost clear” status, the PGA Scalp Psoriasis score, and the Dermatology Life Quality Index. A modified intent-to-treat analysis was performed.

Results

At week 12, comparable high proportions of responders were reported in the continuous (71.3%) and interrupted (72.0%) arms. However, the proportion of responders at week 24 was greater in the continuous group than in the interrupted group (71.0% vs 59.5%; P < .0001). Similar results were observed in secondary end points. The mean number of etanercept doses (1 dose = 50 mg) received by patients in the continuous group was 33.4, compared with 28.0 in the interrupted group. Etanercept was well tolerated in both treatment arms.

Limitations

We examined one round of discontinuation and re-treatment; interrupted therapy provided less total medication to responding patients.

Conclusions

Continuous and interrupted etanercept therapy was effective and generally well tolerated in patients with psoriasis, with greater improvements observed in the continuous arm at week 24. Most patients regained their response after reinitiation of etanercept.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abbreviations used : AE, BSA, PGA, QW, SAE


Plan


 Funding sources: Amgen Inc. and Wyeth Research.
Disclosures: Dr Moore has received honoraria or funding from Abbott, Allergan, Amgen, Astellas, Biogen, Centocor, Connetics, Dermik, Galderma, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Healthpoint, 3M, Medicis, Novartis, and Warner Chilcott. Dr Gordon has received support and honoraria from the following companies: Abbott, Amgen, Biogen, Centocor, and Genentech. Dr Kang has received research funding from Amgen. Dr Gottlieb is a consultant for several companies (Amgen Inc; BiogenIdec, Inc; Centocor, Inc.; Wyeth Pharmaceuticals; Schering-Plough Corporation; Eisai; Celgene Corp; Bristol Myers Squibb Co; Beiersdorf, Inc; Warner Chilcott; Abbott Labs; Roche; Sankyo; Medarex; Kemia; Celera; TEVA; Actelion; UCB; Novo Nordisk; Almirall; Immune Control) and is on the speaker’s bureau for Amgen Inc. and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. Dr Freundlich is an employee of Wyeth. Drs Xia and Stevens are employees of Amgen.
The data in this article have been presented at the 2005 AAD Academy meeting in Chicago, Ill, July 20-24, 2005 and the 2006 AAD annual meeting in San Francisco, Calif, March 3-7, 2006.


© 2007  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 56 - N° 4

P. 598-603 - avril 2007 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • New prognostic relevant factors in primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphomas
  • Christian Hallermann, Christoph Niermann, Rudolf-Josef Fischer, Hans-Joachim Schulze
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Change of Address

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.