Comparison of Ventricular Structure and Function in Chinese Patients With Heart Failure and Ejection Fractions >55% Versus 40% to 55% Versus <40% - 13/08/11
, Daniel Burkhoff, MD, PhD c, Wen-Xiu Leng, MD a, Zhi-Ru Liang, MD a, Li Fan, MD a, Jie Wang, MD, PhD c, Mathew S. Maurer, MD b, cRésumé |
Subjects with heart failure (HF) and a preserved ejection fraction (EF) are heterogenous and the EF used to define this syndrome varies considerably among studies. We sought to determine if physiologic differences exist between subjects with a normal EF (>55%) or mildly decreased EF (40% to 55%). 357 consecutive Chinese patients who were healthy (n = 93) or had HF (n = 264) underwent comprehensive echocardiography, Doppler analysis, and measurement of neurohormones. Subjects with HF were stratified by EF into those with normal EF (>55%, n = 128), mildly decreased EF (40% to 55%, n = 38), or moderate to severely decreased EF (<40%, n = 100). Employing noninvasive pressure–volume analysis, estimated end-systolic and end-diastolic pressure–volume relations were calculated. Subjects with HF and an EF 40% to 55% more often had a previous myocardial infarction and diabetes than those with HF and an EF >55%. Physiologically, the cohort with a mildly decreased EF had eccentrically enlarged ventricles with evidence of remodeling (rightward shifted end-diastolic pressure–volume relation) and decreased chamber contractility (downward shifted end-systolic pressure–volume relation) most comparable to subjects with overt systolic HF. In conclusion, in subjects with HF and a preserved EF, there are distinct physiologic differences between those with a normal (>55%) and a mildly decreased (40% to 55%) EF.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| This work is supported by Grants 2007AA02Z4B7 and 2006DFB32210 from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China, Beijing, China and by Grant 7052063 from the Beijing Natural Science Foundation, Beijing, China. Dr. Maurer was supported by Grant R01AG027518-01A1 from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Maryland. |
Vol 103 - N° 6
P. 845-851 - mars 2009 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
