Creating Effective Learning in Today's Emergency Departments: How Accomplished Teachers Get It Done - 18/08/11
, Shirley Lee, MD, MHSc, Richard Tiberius, PhDAbstract |
Study objectives |
Significant impediments to effective emergency department (ED) teaching compromise what could otherwise be an excellent learning milieu. There is little literature to guide faculty development around specific emergency medicine teaching techniques. We determine what recognized experts in emergency medicine teaching consider to be the important clinical teaching behaviors that make them good teachers, the main impediments to good teaching in EDs, and important prerequisites for a good ED teacher.
Methods |
This was a structured telephone survey with qualitative grounded-theory analysis. Participants were current Canadian emergency medicine teaching faculty who have won awards, been promoted, or received persistent excellent evaluations according to their ED teaching. Participants underwent a 45- to 60-minute standardized structured telephone interview. Interviews were transcribed and independently coded by 2 investigators using a grounded-theory approach. The codes were merged by consensus, and the data were recoded. Twenty percent of data were then coded by both investigators to estimate interrater reliability of final coding. Discrepancies were resolved by agreement.
Results |
Of 43 potential participants, 33 were still in practice, available, and willing to participate. Twelve ED-specific, practical, implementable strategies representing the general themes of learner-centeredness, active learning, individual relevance, and efficiency emerged. Participants collectively identified 6 significant impediments to teaching and 9 prerequisites to being an effective ED teacher.
Conclusion |
Accomplished emergency medicine teaching faculty identify with common impediments to ED teaching yet are able to describe practical, easily implemented strategies that they believe make them good teachers. They also take advantage of basic prerequisites for good teaching.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Author contributions: GB conceived the study. GB and RT designed the study and obtained research funding. RT provided methodologic expertise. GB and SL conducted the study and data analysis. GB wrote the manuscript, with substantial editorial and content revisions by RT and SL. GB takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. Funding and support: Supported by grants from the Dean's Excellence Fund, University of Toronto and the St. Michael's Hospital Educational Fund. Reprints not available from the authors. |
Vol 45 - N° 3
P. 253-261 - mars 2005 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
