Do factors that are important during obstetrics and gynecology residency program selection differ by applicant gender? - 18/08/11
Abstract |
Objective |
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between applicant gender and factors that influence obstetrics and gynecology residency program selection.
Study design |
A national survey was conducted of graduates of US allopathic medical schools who were registered with the Electronic Residency Application Service for the year 2003 and who indicated that obstetrics and gynecology was their primary specialty choice. The selection prevalence of 20 possible influential factors was analyzed by gender.
Results |
Our study cohort consisted of 450 eligible respondents, 80.4% of whom were female. There were no significant differences by gender in regards to applicant age, race, marital status, number of dependents, or geographic region of medical school. Overall, the 4 factors with the highest selection prevalence in both gender groups were all related to workplace environment. Compared with male respondents, female respondents were more likely to consider how well the current residents seemed to work together (99.2% vs 94.3%; P=.002) and the amount of conference/didactic teaching (80.4% vs 68.2%; P=.01). Male respondents were more likely to consider the quality of the hospital facility (92% vs 82%; P=.02), salary (28.4% vs 17.1%; P=.02), and supplemental income (moonlighting) opportunities (18.2% vs 8.6%; P=.008), as compared with female respondents.
Conclusion |
Significant differences in gender-associated preferences that are related to obstetrics and gynecology residency program selection exist and include both curricular and financial factors.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : Residency selection, Gender, Quality of life, Graduate medical education
Plan
| Supported by the National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development (K24 HD043314-01). Presented at the 2004 Association of Professors of Obstetrics & Gynecology Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida, March 3-6, 2004. Reprints not available from the authors. |
Vol 193 - N° 4
P. 1540-1543 - octobre 2005 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
