Multidetector Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review - 18/08/11
, Afzal Beemath, MD a, Fadi Kayali, MD a, Elias Skaf, MD a, Julia Sanchez, MD a, Ronald E. Olson, PhD cAbstract |
Purpose |
The study’s purpose was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (CT) for the detection of coronary artery disease.
Subjects and methods |
A search of the literature in all languages was performed incorporating both electronic and manual components. Manual reference checks of recent reviews and all original investigations supplemented the electronic searches.
Results |
Average sensitivity for patient-based detection of significant (>50% or ≥50%) stenosis was 61 of 64 (95%) with 4-slice CT, 276 of 292 (95%) with 16-slice CT, and 47 of 47 (100%) with 64-slice CT. Average specificity was 84% for 4-slice CT, 84% for 16-slice CT, and 100% for 64-slice CT. The sensitivity for a significant stenosis in evaluable segments was 307 of 372 (83%) with 4-slice CT, 1023 of 1160 (88%) with 16-slice CT, and 165 of 176 (94%) with 64-slice CT. Average specificity was 93% or greater with all multidetector CT. Seventy-eight percent of segments were evaluable with 4-slice CT, 91% with 16-slice CT, and 100% with 64-slice CT. Stenoses in proximal and mid-segments were shown with a higher sensitivity than distal segments. Left main stenosis was identified with high sensitivity with all multidetector CT, but sensitivity in other vessels increased with an increasing number of detectors.
Conclusion |
Multidetector CT has the potential to be used as a screening test in appropriate patients. Contrast-enhanced 16-slice CT seems to be reasonably sensitive and specific for the detection of significant coronary artery disease but has shortcomings. Preliminary data with 64-slice CT suggest that it is more sensitive and specific.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Coronary artery disease, Coronary angiography, Computed tomography
Plan
Vol 119 - N° 3
P. 203-216 - mars 2006 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
