Current Concepts in Validity and Reliability for Psychometric Instruments: Theory and Application - 18/08/11
, Thomas J. Beckman, MD : FACP
Requests for reprints should be addressed to: David A. Cook, MD, MHPE, Baldwin 4-A, Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.Abstract |
Validity and reliability relate to the interpretation of scores from psychometric instruments (eg, symptom scales, questionnaires, education tests, and observer ratings) used in clinical practice, research, education, and administration. Emerging paradigms replace prior distinctions of face, content, and criterion validity with the unitary concept “construct validity,” the degree to which a score can be interpreted as representing the intended underlying construct. Evidence to support the validity argument is collected from 5 sources:
• | Content: do instrument items completely represent the construct? |
• | Response process: the relationship between the intended construct and the thought processes of subjects or observers |
• | Internal structure: acceptable reliability and factor structure |
• | Relations to other variables: correlation with scores from another instrument assessing the same construct |
• | Consequences: do scores really make a difference? |
Keywords : Construct validity, Reproducibility of results, Educational measurement, Medical education, Quality of life, Questionnaire
Plan
Vol 119 - N° 2
P. 166.e7-166.e16 - février 2006 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- The Uninsured Patient
- Baldeep Singh, Rachel Golden
- What Does Minor Elevation of C-Reactive Protein Signify?
- Irving Kushner, Debra Rzewnicki, David Samols
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?