To operate or not to operate? A multi-method analysis of decision-making in emergency surgery - 19/08/11
, Sonal Arora, B.Sc., M.B.B.S., M.R.C.S. a, Nick Sevdalis, B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D. a, b
Corresponding author: Tel.: 44-789-6223424; fax: 44-151-7065828Abstract |
Background |
The ability to decide when to operate and when not to operate is a key surgical skill. The aim of this study was to investigate factors affecting that decision.
Methods |
In phase 1, semistructured interviews were used to investigate how expert surgeons decide when to operate. In phase 2, clinical case vignettes were constructed, and 22 general surgeons at various stages of their training indicated whether they would operate and their confidence in patient outcomes.
Results |
Interviews answers centered on the theme of “patient outcome,” which was defined similarly by all surgeons. In phase 2, surgeons chose to operate when they perceived the outcome with an operation to be better than the outcome without. Surgeons with <5 years of experience were less certain about what outcomes might be. These surgeons opted to perform significantly more operations (40 ± 4%) than surgeons with ≥5 years of experience (18 ± 2%).
Conclusions |
A subjective, balanced assessment of the likelihood of patient outcome is crucial in deciding whether to operate. Novices face higher degrees of uncertainty, explaining differences in decisions taken.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Decision making, Emergency surgery, Qualitative outcome assessment, Surgical education
Plan
| Dr Sevdalis is a member of the Imperial Centre for Patient Safety and Service Quality at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, which is funded by the National Institute of Health Research. Dr Sevdalis is also funded by the Economic and Social Research Council Centre for Economic Learning and Social Evolution. |
Vol 200 - N° 2
P. 298-304 - août 2010 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of outcomes
- Georgia Dedemadi, George Sgourakis, Arnold Radtke, Alexandros Dounavis, Ines Gockel, Ioannis Fouzas, Constantine Karaliotas, Evangelos Anagnostou
- Laparoscopic transgastric esophageal mucosal resection: 4-year minimum follow-up
- Constantine T. Frantzides, Mark A. Carlson, Ali Keshavarzian, Jacob E. Roberts
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?