Gestational age at previous preterm birth does not affect cerclage efficacy - 19/08/11
Vaginal Ultrasound Trial Consortium
Résumé |
Objective |
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of earliest previous spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) gestational age on cervical length, pregnancy duration, and ultrasound-indicated cerclage efficacy in a subsequent gestation.
Study Design |
Planned secondary analysis of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development–trial of cerclage for cervical length of <25 mm. Women with at least 1 previous SPTB between 17-33 weeks 6 days of gestation underwent serial vaginal ultrasound screening between 16 and 23 weeks 6 days of gestation; cervical length at qualifying randomization evaluation was used.
Results |
We observed a significant correlation (P = .0008) between previous SPTB gestational age and qualifying cervical length. In a linear regression model that was controlled for cervical length and cerclage, neither previous SPTB gestational age nor the interaction between cerclage and previous birth gestational age was significant predictor of subsequent birth gestational age.
Conclusion |
Although there is an association between previous SPTB gestational age and cervical length in women with a mid-trimester cervical length of <25 mm, there does not appear to be a disproportionate benefit of cerclage in women with earlier previous SPTB.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : cerclage, cervical length, earliest gestational age, spontaneous preterm birth
Plan
| Reprints not available from the authors. |
|
| Supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development (Grant no. U01 HD039939). |
|
| Other members of the Vaginal Ultrasound Trial Consortium are Susan Ramin, MD; Mark Tomlinson, MD; Eric Knudtson, MD; Robert Egerman, MD; Richard Silver, MD; Helen How, MD; and Mike Gordon, MD. |
|
| Cite this article as: Wing DA, Szychowski J, Owen J, et al. Gestational age at previous preterm birth does not affect cerclage efficacy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:377.e1-4. |
Vol 203 - N° 4
P. 377.e1-377.e4 - octobre 2010 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
