Discussion: ‘Scheduling the first prenatal visit’ by Nettleman et al - 19/08/11
Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.059
Anthony Shanks, MD a : Moderator, Jeanine Carbone, MD b : Discussant, Katherine Goetzinger, MD c : Discussant, Janice Reed, MD d : Discussant, Jessica Groden, MD e : Discussant
a Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
b Second-Year Fellow, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
c First-Year Fellow, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
d Third-Year Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
e Second-Year Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
Résumé |
In the roundtable that follows, clinicians discuss a study published in this issue of the Journal in light of its methodology, relevance to practice, and implications for future research. Article discussed:
Nettleman MD, Brewer J, Stafford M. Scheduling the first prenatal visit: office-based delays. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:207.e1-3.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
© 2010
Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Vol 203 - N° 3
P. e1-e4 - septembre 2010 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Loop electrosurgical excision procedure with an intrauterine device in place
- Amelia P. Bailey, Mixon M. Darracott
- Squamous cell carcinoma arising from a localized vulval lesion of Hailey-Hailey disease after tacrolimus therapy
- Verena von Felbert, Monika Hampl, Carolina Talhari, Rainer Engers, Mosaad Megahed
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?