Abdominal Compression Effectively Increases the Size of the Common Femoral Vein, as Measured by Ultrasonography - 21/08/11
, Ovidiu Pascu, MB BS a, Ian Jacobs, B App Sc, PhD bRésumé |
Study objective |
We determine the effect of abdominal compression on common femoral vein cross-sectional area. The effects of Valsalva maneuver and reverse Trendelenburg's position are also studied.
Methods |
Prospective, observational, comparative evaluation performed on sequential patients presenting to an adult emergency department. Using ultrasonography, common femoral vein area was measured with patients in supine and reverse Trendelenburg's positions. In each position measurements were taken at baseline while abdominal compression was performed and while the patient performed the Valsalva maneuver. Abdominal compression involved pressing with an examining hand over the patient's right upper abdomen.
Results |
Fifty patients were enrolled in the study. The average common femoral vein area measured 0.89 cm2 at baseline in the supine position. It increased 0.47 cm2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38 to 0.57 cm2) to 1.36 cm2 with abdominal compression and by 0.90 cm2 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.07 cm2) to 1.79 cm2 with the Valsalva maneuver. In the reverse Trendelenburg's position, the common femoral vein area averaged 1.10 cm2, 0.22 cm2 bigger than the supine baseline area (95% CI 0.13 to 0.30 cm2). With additional abdominal compression, the vein area increased by 0.71 cm2 to 1.59 cm2 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.83 cm2). With the patient performing the Valsalva maneuver in the reverse Trendelenburg's position, the vein increased in area 1.07 cm2 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.24 cm2) to 1.96 cm2.
Conclusion |
Abdominal compression increases the cross-sectional area of the common femoral vein, and the reverse Trendelenburg's position has a further additive effect. Abdominal compression may be useful when femoral venous cannulation is attempted. In patients who can comply, the Valsalva maneuver may be even more effective.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Supervising editor: Steven M. Green, MD |
|
| Author contributions: JCRR conceived the study. JCRR and OP were involved in obtaining ethics approval, recruited patients, performed the study, and wrote the article. OP tabulated and preliminarily analyzed results. JCRR, OP, and IJ designed the study. IJ conducted statistical analysis of data. JCRR takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. |
|
| Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that might create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. Sonosite provided the ultrasonography machine used by Dr. Rippey in this study. Sonosite has also funded Dr. Rippey for teaching concerning the uses of ultrasonography in emergency medicine. |
|
| Publication dates: Available online June 16, 2008. |
|
| Reprints not available from the authors. |
Vol 52 - N° 4
P. 446-452 - octobre 2008 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
