Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy - 23/08/11
Reprint requests: Thomas F. Imperiale, MD, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN 46202.Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
Abstract |
Background |
Variation in polyp detection among endoscopists has been used to justify the need for establishing quality standards for colonoscopy performance.
Objective |
To measure variation in polyp detection rates (PDRs) among endoscopists who perform screening colonoscopy and to identify associated factors.
Design |
Cross-sectional analysis of summary-level data.
Setting |
Endoscopy practices in central Indiana.
Subjects |
Twenty-five endoscopists and their patients.
Main Outcome Measurements |
Mean procedure time (MPT); proportions of patients with any polyp, any adenoma, any polyp ≥1.0 cm, and multiple adenomas; and variation in PDRs and identification of outliers. Multiple linear regression analysis identified factors that accounted for the variation in PDRs.
Results |
A total of 2664 screening colonoscopies (1108 women and 1556 men) were performed. The mean patient age was 59 years; the mean proportion of women was 42%; the MPT was 17.1 minutes. Adenoma detection rates ranged from 7% to 44% (P < .001) and from 0% to 13% for large polyps, which was not statistically significant (P = .07). For all polyp categories, only 1 to 3 high outlier endoscopists (ie, higher than mean PDRs) were identified. Models that included the number of procedures, mean age, percentage of women, and MPT accounted for 36% to 56% of the variation in PDRs. In all models, only MPT was significantly associated with PDRs.
Limitations |
Whether each endoscopist’s cohort was at comparable risk for colorectal neoplasia was uncertain. In comparison with individual-level data, analysis of summary-level data is limited.
Conclusions |
PDRs vary widely among endoscopists, although only a few (high) outliers were identified. Variation in PDRs was associated only with MPT. Further research is needed to determine the clinical importance of and reasons for this variation.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Abbreviations : MPT, PDR, RR
Plan
| DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication. Grant support: NIH grant K24 DK 002756. |
|
| See CME section; p. 1350. |
Vol 69 - N° 7
P. 1288-1295 - juin 2009 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- From iatrogenic digestive perforation to complete anastomotic disunion: endoscopic stenting as a new concept of “stent-guided regeneration and re-epithelialization”
- Laila Amrani, Charles Ménard, Stéphane Berdah, Olivier Emungania, Phillipe Ah Soune, Clément Subtil, Christian Brunet, Jean-Charles Grimaud, Marc Barthet
- Inequities in colonoscopy: variation in performance and outcomes of colonoscopy
- Harminder Singh, Gurkirpal Singh
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?