A randomized, double-blind study comparing 5 days oral gemifloxacin with 7 days oral levofloxacin in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis - 23/08/11
, C Fogarty b, A Fulambarker cAbstract |
Objective: To demonstrate that 5 days of treatment with a new fluoroquinolone, gemifloxacin, is at least as effective as 7 days of treatment with levofloxacin in adult patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB).
Design: Randomized, double-blind, double dummy, multicentre, parallel group study
Setting: Sixty different medical centers in US, UK and Germany.
Material and methods: A total of 360 adults (>40years of age) with AECB were randomly assigned to receive gemifloxacin 320mg once daily for 5 days or levofloxacin 500mg once daily for 7 days. The primary efficacy parameter was a clinical response at follow-up (Days 14–21).
Results: In total, 335/360 patients completed the study (93.1%). Seven patients receiving gemifloxacin withdrew from the study compared to 18 patients receiving levofloxacin; this difference was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test: p=0.02). In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, the clinical success rate at follow-up (Days 14–21) was 85.2% (155/182) with gemifloxacin and 78.1% (139/178) with levofloxacin. Clinical success rate in the per-protocol (PP) population was 88.2% (134/152) with gemifloxacin and 85.1% (126/148) with levofloxacin. At long-term follow-up (Days 28–35), the clinical success rates in the PP population were 83.7% (123/147) with gemifloxacin and 78.4% (109/139) with levofloxacin. The difference in success rates was 5.26% (95% CI: −3.83, 14.34).
Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of gemifloxacin 320mg once daily for 5 days in AECB was at least as good as levofloxacin 500mg once daily for 7 days. Fewer withdrawals and superior clinical efficacy at long-term follow-up were also seen with gemifloxacin.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Gemifloxacin, Acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, Clinical trial, Levofloxacin, Respiratory tract infection
Plan
| 212 Clinical Study Group Germany : E. Beck, H Bouzo, R. Dichmann, H. Frick, U. Harnest, J. Junggeburth, H. Kafurke, P. Klinger, R. Mardini, O. Mueller, I. Naudts, H. Samer, A. Schmidt, G. Scholz, G. Tangerding, J. Watcher, W. Weede. United Kingdom: D. McKeith, I. McColl, C. Langan, C. McKinnon, B. Glekin, P. McEleny, R. Cook, J. Cecil, J. Purohit. United States: C. Albarracin, J. Behm, E. Bolster, N. Campbell, G. Carr, L. Carter, T. Cheek, K, Chinsky, S. Christensen, D. Creager, T. Fiel, A. Fulambarker, L. Gidel, M. Heuer, R. Huling, A. Leschinsky, D. Lorch, R. Paster, G. Patrick, R. Ramirez, P. Ratner, A. Razzetti, M. Ringold, S. Sethi, T. Siler, S. Simon, S. Singh, E. Skobeloff, L. Smith, R. Snyder, D. Turner, J. Verhey, M. Ziter, R. Zuckerman, J. Baker, C. Fogarty. |
Vol 98 - N° 8
P. 697-707 - août 2004 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
