Screening for Emergent Risk and Service Needs Among Incarcerated Youth: Comparing MAYSI-2 and Voice DISC-IV - 24/08/11
, Larkin S. McReynolds, M.P.H., Susan J. Ko, PH.D., Laura M. Katz, M.P.H., Elizabeth Cauffman, PH.D., William Haxton, PH.D., Christopher P. Lucas, M.D., M.P.H.ABSTRACT |
Objective |
To examine associations between the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-Second Version (MAYSI-2) and Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Present State Voice Version (DISC-IV) and the extent to which they overlap in identifying youths with mental health concerns.
Method |
Among 325 New Jersey and South Carolina correctional youths, associations were examined using receiver operating characteristic analyses and logistic regression (binomial and multinomial).
Results |
MAYSI-2 subscales generally mapped best onto homotypic DISC-IV disorders; however, many subscales mapped almost as well onto heterotypic disorders. Alcohol/Drug Use and Suicide Ideation, respectively, identified youths reporting substance disorder and recent attempt; other subscales did not identify parallel DISC-IV disorders as well.
Conclusions |
MAYSI-2 identifies some DISC-IV disorders better than others. Lack of overlap may result from MAYSI-2’s combining diagnostic constructs into single subscales. Substantial percentages of disordered youths were not identified by corresponding subscales. In systems with multiple avenues of referral, the MAYSI-2 is a useful intake screen, but its utility as the sole means for identifying diagnoses for treatment purposes is limited. The authors differentiate between screening for emergent risk and service needs, recommending best practices for a comprehensive approach to mental health assessment among justice youth.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key Words : juvenile justice, screening, psychiatric disorder, Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-Second Version, Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Present State Voice Version
Plan
| This paper was supported by grants from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (1999-JR-VX-0005) . The authors thank Mark Davies, M.P.H., for his statistical advice. |
Vol 43 - N° 5
P. 629-639 - mai 2004 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
