Liver function tests in metastatic uveal melanoma - 25/08/11
, Radgonde Amer, MD a, Jacob Pe'er, MD aAbstract |
Purpose |
To evaluate trends in liver function tests before detection of liver metastases from uveal melanoma.
Design |
Retrospective, comparative, observational case control study.
Methods |
Setting: The Israel uveal melanoma center at the Hadassah University Hospital. Patient Population: A total of 307 uveal melanoma patients who were diagnosed with uveal melanoma and followed between the years 1988 and 1998. Of them, 30 metastatic patients who had regular follow-up by liver function tests (LFTs) and liver imaging were included in this study. Eighty nonmetastatic patients were randomly chosen as controls. Observation Procedure: The medical records of the metastatic and control groups were reviewed documenting LFTs and liver imaging results. Main Outcome Measures: The mean level of each LFT, its sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio at various time periods before the detection of metastases by liver imaging.
Results |
At the time of diagnosis of liver metastases by imaging, 50% of patients had at least one abnormal LFT (compared with only 5% of the control group). While no change was noted in the mean serum levels of bilirubin, mean lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline-phosphatase, gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (γGTP) aspartate-aminotrasferase, and alanine-aminotrasferase levels seem to rise, even within normal limits, during the 6 months before the detection of metastases. Based on likelihood ratios, alkaline-phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase were the most predictive tests. Lactate dehydrogenase and aspartate-aminotransferase were already predictive at 80% of the upper normal limit, whereas alkaline-phosphatase and γ-glutamyltransferase were most predictive at the upper normal limit.
Conclusions |
Monitoring the changes in selected LFTs, even within normal limits, can help predict metastatic uveal melanoma.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| ☆ | Biosketches and/or additional material at www.ajo.com. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2003.08.045 Internet Advance publication at ajo.com August 28, 2003 |
Vol 137 - N° 2
P. 236-243 - février 2004 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
