PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT OF ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - 03/09/11
Résumé |
The description of the anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy and the introduction of nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy (NSRRP) in 1983 represented a major advance in the surgical treatment of prostate cancer. Nonetheless, the results with respect to postoperative potency preservation vary widely between surgeons and institutions. The post–radical retropubic prostatectomy population with erectile dysfunction is unique. Unlike in most patients who have erectile dysfunction in whom there is a gradual reduction in erectile function over many years, the loss of function in the post–radical retropubic prostatectomy patient is initially sudden and total. All patients experience a change in their sexual function ranging from a decrease in orgasmic intensity to loss of ejaculation to erectile dysfunction to a loss of urine at orgasm.20, 30 Less than 10% of previously potent patients consider their long-term postoperative sexual function as good as their preoperative status. Surgeons are left with the difficult task of explaining to patients why a procedure designed to spare their potency nerves does not translate into a potency-preserving surgery. Patients who preoperatively primarily were concerned with survival, cancer cure, and incontinence are left with the prospect of never again achieving an adequate erection.
Institutions with single surgeons and a large case load report potency rates in excess of 65%, whereas other institutions report success rates of less than 20%.20, 24, 46, 56 The reasons for this discrepancy are multiple. This article reviews current knowledge on the etiology, treatment, and possible prevention of erectile dysfunction and promising future directions.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Address reprint requests to Andrew R. McCullough, MD, FACS, Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016 |
Vol 28 - N° 3
P. 613-627 - août 2001 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
