Worldwide, more than 190 million couples have chosen sterilization as their contraceptive method.226 Peterson H.B., Pollack A.E., Warshaw J.S. Tubal sterilization Te Linde's Operative Gynecology Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven (1997).
529
Cliquez ici pour aller à la section Références, 249 Ross JA, Frankenberg E: Sterilization. In Ross JA, Frankenberg E Findings From Two Decades of Family Planning Research New York, Population Council, 1993, p 57 (III)
Cliquez ici pour aller à la section Références, 257 Ryder R.M., Vaughan M.C. Laparoscopic tubal sterilization Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1999 ; 26 : 83 III.
Cliquez ici pour aller à la section Références Sterilization is the most prevalent contraceptive method in the United States, and is used by 39% of contracepting reproductive-aged couples. In comparison, 27% of persons practicing contraception use oral contraceptives, 20% use condoms, and 3% use injectables.231 Piccinino L.J., Mosher W.D. Trends in contraceptive use in the United States: 1982–1995 Fam Plann Perspec 1998 ; 30 : 4 III.
[cross-ref]
Cliquez ici pour aller à la section Références Female tubal sterilization represents 72% of all sterilizations (male and female) in the United States.231 Piccinino L.J., Mosher W.D. Trends in contraceptive use in the United States: 1982–1995 Fam Plann Perspec 1998 ; 30 : 4 III.
[cross-ref]
Cliquez ici pour aller à la section Références Trends in tubal sterilization over the past 25 years reveal an annual increase in procedures and a change in timing of the procedure. In 1970, 29% of the estimated 201,000 female sterilizations were performed during the interval period (6 or more weeks postdelivery).218 Peterson H.B., Greenspan J.R., DeStefano F. , et al. The impact of laparoscopy on tubal sterilization in United States hospitals: 1970 and 1975 to 1978 Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981 ; 140 : 811 III.
Cliquez ici pour aller à la section Références In 1995, 54% of the estimated 693,000 tubal sterilizations were interval procedures,125 Haws J.M., Pollack A.E., Beattie K.J. , et al. New data on sterilization in the United States. Invited presentation at a meeting on Male and Female Sterilization: Medical Effects and Behavioral Issues, convened by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health (June 1998). (III).
Cliquez ici pour aller à la section Références and 95% of these were performed in either a hospital outpatient surgical unit (82%) or a free-standing surgery center (13%).125 Haws J.M., Pollack A.E., Beattie K.J. , et al. New data on sterilization in the United States. Invited presentation at a meeting on Male and Female Sterilization: Medical Effects and Behavioral Issues, convened by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health (June 1998). (III).
Cliquez ici pour aller à la section Références In the United States, the increased use of tubal sterilization, from 9% of married couples in 1973 to more than 23% by 1988, occurred concurrently with the widespread availability and acceptability of laparoscopy.218 Peterson H.B., Greenspan J.R., DeStefano F. , et al. The impact of laparoscopy on tubal sterilization in United States hospitals: 1970 and 1975 to 1978 Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981 ; 140 : 811 III.
Cliquez ici pour aller à la section Références, 226 Peterson H.B., Pollack A.E., Warshaw J.S. Tubal sterilization Te Linde's Operative Gynecology Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven (1997).
529
Cliquez ici pour aller à la section Références
This review focuses on studies that impact on clinical care and standards for female sterilization. Specific issues that are discussed include the timing of the procedure, the operative approach, occlusion methods, immediate and long-term complications, and noncontraceptive health benefits. An emphasis is placed on level I and level II studies.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.
© 2000
W. B. Saunders Company. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.