MAPPING THE ROAD TO QUALITY COLLABORATIVE PATIENT CARE IN A BEHAVIORAL HEALTH COMMUNITY TREATMENT CENTER : Avoiding the Detours of Managed Care - 06/09/11
Résumé |
Accrediting bodies such as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), the Commission for the Accreditation of Rehabilitative Facilities (CARF), and the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) are increasing their focus on the deployment and documentation of quality management activities in behavioral health care. Also, managed care organizations are increasing their focus on cost containment and medical necessity criteria that describes the level, intensity, and duration of patient care services. Accrediting and managed care organizations share similarities in their recommendations to health care facilities and service providers, such as:
• | Emphasis on individual care decisions based on documented client outcomes and variations |
• | Provision of immediate feedback to practitioners |
• | Reduction of case management demands |
• | Emphasis on quality improvement and cost-effective care |
• | Support of provider autonomy and judgment in care decisions |
• | Increased use of internally generated quality and outcome guidelines |
• | Improvement of provider service systems and patient responsiveness |
• | Clear documentation of what changes occurred as a result of the investment of human and fiscal resources |
Collaborative care by critical paths and case management was first introduced into acute medical-surgical care by a group of visionary nurses at the New England Medical Center Hospital (NEMCH) in 1985.7 The Center for Case Management (CCM) successfully implemented case management and critical paths at NEMCH and has influenced significant changes in the health care environment by the development of outcome tools that met the challenge of diagnostic related groups (DRGs) and the soon-to-emerge economic constraints of managed care.
It became apparent that professional caregivers had to “either make the larger system work for the patient or directly experience the patients anger, pain, and complications related to inefficient or ineffective activities”.7 The first-generation tools developed by Zander and Bowers of CCM were case management plans (replacing nursing care plans) and critical paths, which establish timelines for tasks and care. Second-generation tools evolved into CareMaps,* which go one step farther and include outcome statements that were behavioral and measurable. It became obvious that a collaborative case management model and CareMap tools must be adapted for behavioral health patients, and thus in 1987, the work began to develop complementary tools for behavioral health settings that would:
• | Accommodate managed care contracts |
• | Decrease fragmentation and increase access of services |
• | Improve patient–family satisfaction |
• | Operationalize continuous quality improvement (CQI) at the patient care level |
• | Enhance collaboration between disciplines |
• | Provide database (through variance) for CQI |
• | Link actual costs to actual care given |
• | Decrease length of stay and duration of treatment where appropriate |
• | Improve patient and family participation and education |
• | Facilitate action research |
• | Restructure accountability models |
• | Conform to JCAHO, CARF, and NCQA requirements |
• | Streamline documentation |
• | Decrease hospitalization |
• | Develop a realistic outcomes' case management approach |
• | Prepare for computerization of medical record |
Plan
| Address reprint requests to: Gretchen H. Horner, RNC, BSN, 161 State Street, Johnstown, PA 15905 |
Vol 23 - N° 2
P. 363-382 - juin 2000 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
