Changes in Left Ventricular Mass and Function After Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comparison Between Stentless and Stented Bioprosthetic Valves - 07/09/11
Abstract |
The objective of this study was to compare stentless bioprostheses with stented bioprostheses with regard to the postoperative changes in left ventricular (LV) mass and function. Forty patients with aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement with a stentless (20 patients) or a stented (20 patients) bioprosthesis were evaluated early (baseline), 1 year, and 2 years after operation. Left ventricular mass index was calculated with the corrected American Society of Echocardiography formula. The relative changes between end-diastole and end-systole in LV mid-wall radius, length, and volume (ejection fraction) were determined with a previously validated model for dynamic geometry of the left ventricle. Overall, a significant decrease was found in LV mass index (from 155 ± 30 to 112 ± 23 g/m2; P < .001) and a significant increase in longitudinal shortening (from 0.12 ± 0.11 to 0.22 ± 0.08; P < .001), and ejection fractions (from 0.67 ± 0.11 to 0.71 ± 0.10; P = .017). No significant change was found in the mid-wall radius shortening fraction. Two years after surgery, the extent of LV mass regression was greater in stentless bioprostheses (–51 ± 18 vs –35 ± 17 g/m2; P = .01), though the average mass index was similar in both groups (114 ± 26 vs 110 ± 20 g/m2). Also at 2 years, the longitudinal shortening fraction was greater in patients with a stentless bioprosthesis (0.25 ± 0.07 vs 0.18 ± 0.08; P = .03). In conclusion, this study suggests that the superior hemodynamic performance of stentless bioprostheses may have some benefits with regard to LV mass regression and function after aortic valve replacement. The significance of these benefits in terms of prognosis remains to be determined. (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999;12:981-7.)
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| This work was supported in part by operating grants from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Quebec and the Foundation of the Quebec Heart Institute. |
|
| Dr Pibarot is the recipient of Senior Personal Award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Drs Pibarot, Dumesnil, Cartier, and Métras have financial interest in the products presented in this work in that Medtronic Company (Minneapolis, Minn) provides financial support to the Departments of Cardiology and Surgery of the Quebec Heart Institute for the clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of patients who receive a Medtronic Intact, Freestyle, or Mosaic valve. Drs Métras, Cartier, and Dumesnil are the principal investigators of these research projects. They also hold consultant agreements for this company. In addition, Medtronic Company provided mechanical and bioprosthetic valves to the Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of the Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal to perform in vitro studies. Dr Pibarot is an invited researcher at this institution and is co-investigator on this project. |
|
| Reprint requests: Dr Pibarot, Quebec Heart Institute, Laval Hospital, 2725 Chemin Sainte-Foy, Sainte-Foy G1V-4G5, Quebec, Canada (e-mail: philippe.pibarot@med.ulaval.ca). |
|
| 0894-7317/99 $8.00 + 0 27/1/101622 |
Vol 12 - N° 11
P. 981-987 - novembre 1999 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
