Young age as a prognostic factor in cervical cancer: Results of a population-based study - 08/09/11
Abstract |
Objective: Our goal was to use population-based data to determine the difference in 5-year survival in women diagnosed with cervical cancer between those aged 18-34 years and those aged 40-60 years. Study Design: The SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) public-use database, 1973-1994, was used for this investigation. Only subjects with cervical carcinoma diagnosed between 1988 and 1990 were included. Subjects were stratified on age at diagnosis (<35 years or 40-60 years), clinical stage, histologic type, race-ethnicity, and grade. Results: Two thousand cases of invasive cervical cancer were identified. The younger subgroup of patients was diagnosed with earlier-stage disease more frequently than the older group (P = .0001). When adjustments were made for non–cervical cancer causes of death, there was no difference in 5-year survival between the 2 cohorts. African American women had a poorer 5-year survival (P = .02) Conclusion: There was no overall difference in survival between the 2 cohorts when appropriate adjustments were made for cause of death and for stage, histologic type, and grade of disease. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:1464-7.)
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Cervical cancer, young age as a prognostic factor, outcome
Plan
| Supported by National Cancer Institute grant 1R01CA76502, Public Health Institute grant 050N-8707/8710-S1527, and the Lon V. Smith Foundation. |
|
| Reprint requests: Hoda Anton-Culver, PhD, University of California Irvine, Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, 224 Irvine Hall, Irvine, CA 92697-7550. |
|
| 0002-9378/99 $8.00 + 0 6/6/97418 |
Vol 180 - N° 6
P. 1464-1467 - juin 1999 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
