Is amniotic fluid analysis the key to preterm labor? A model using interleukin-6 for predicting rapid delivery - 09/09/11
Abstract |
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to create a model for predicting amnionitis and rapid delivery in preterm labor patients by use of amniotic fluid interleukin-6 and clinical parameters.
STUDY DESIGN: Amniotic fluid was cultured and analyzed, and a clinical score (incorporating gestational age, amniotic fluid Gram stain, glucose, leukocyte esterase, and maternal serum C-reactive protein) was determined in 111 patients diagnosed with preterm labor. Statistical analysis involved t tests, χ2, logarithmic regression, and multivariate regression analysis (P ≤ .05).
RESULTS: The incidence of positive amniotic fluid cultures was 8.7% (9 of 103 patients). Patients with positive cultures of the amniotic fluid had a shorter delivery interval (4.8 ± 7.5 vs 28.9 ± 25.4 days, P < .001). Patients with elevated amniotic fluid interleukin-6 (≥7586 pg/ml) were more likely to have a positive amniotic fluid culture (relative risk = 8.8, 95% confidence interval = 1.6 to 47.4, P < .001) and to be delivered within 2 days (relative risk = 16.8, 95% confidence interval = 4.5 to 62.7, P < .001). Stepwise multivariate regression analysis yielded a model using interleukin-6, cervical dilatation, and gestational age (r 2 = 0.63, P < .001) with a specificity of 100% for predicting delivery within 2 days of amniocentesis.
CONCLUSIONS: A mathematical model using maternal amniotic fluid interleukin-6 seems to be a useful clinical tool for quantifying the interval to preterm birth for patients in preterm labor. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:172-8.)
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Preterm labor, amniotic fluid analysis, interleukin-6
Plan
| From the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,a and the Division of Biostatistics, Department of Mathematics,b University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center. |
|
| Supported in part by Pfizer-Roerig, Inc, grant No. NCRR-GCRC M01-RR00997, and National Institutes of Health grant No. 5T35HD074603. |
|
| Reprints not available from the authors. |
|
| 0002-9378/98 $5.00 + 0 6/1/87728 |
Vol 179 - N° 1
P. 172-178 - juillet 1998 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
