Comparison of teaching the basic electrocardiographic concept of frontal plane QRS axis using the classical versus the orderly electrocardiogram limb lead displays - 10/09/11
Abstract |
This study compares the effectiveness of teaching the calculation of frontal plane QRS axis with the use of the classical versus the orderly electrocardiographic limb lead display. Eighty-three students from two environments were randomized into two groups and were taught to determine frontal plane axis with one of the methods. The accuracy and time to determine the axis were tested on 10 electrocardiograms. In the United States the group using the classical display achieved 4.2 (±2.7) correct answers, whereas those using the orderly method achieved 6.8 (±3.0) (p = 0.0006). The classical group used 9.2 (±2.8) minutes to complete the test, whereas the orderly group needed 7.2 (±2.0) minutes (p = 0.015). The results achieved in Sweden were similar. The use of the orderly electrocardiographic limb lead display results in greater diagnostic accuracy in less time than the classical display when determining the frontal plane QRS axis. (Am Heart J 1997;134:1014-8.)
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| From the aDepartment of Medicine/Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C., the bDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, and the cDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. |
|
| Ulrika Pahlm was supported as a Medical Student Research Fellow of the American Heart Association. |
|
| Reprint requests: Galen S. Wagner, MD, Department of Medicine/Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3636, Durham, NC 27710. |
|
| 4/1/86029 |
Vol 134 - N° 6
P. 1014-1018 - décembre 1997 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
