Uterine artery embolization vs surgery: van der Kooij et al - 01/10/11
Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.046
David Chelmow, MD : Moderator
Leo J Dunn Distinguished Professor and Chair, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA
Sara E. Ivey, MD, MPH : Discussant
Resident Physician, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA
Beth Lyn Tozer, MD : Discussant
Resident Physician, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA
Nicole W. Karjane, MD : Discussant
Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA
David Chelmow, MD; George A. Macones, MD, MSCE, Associate Editor
Résumé |
The article below summarizes a roundtable discussion of a study published in this issue of the Journal in light of its methodology, relevance to practice, and implications for future research. Article discussed:
van der Kooij SM, Bipat S, Hehenkemp WJK, et al. Uterine artery embolization vs surgery in the treatment of symptomatic fibroids: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:317.e1-18.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
© 2011
Mosby, Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Vol 205 - N° 4
P. 389-390 - octobre 2011 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Midtrimester dilation and evacuation versus prostaglandin induction: a comparison of composite outcomes
- Kari A. Whitley, Kevin Trinchere, Wendy Prutsman, Joanne N. Quiñones, Meredith L. Rochon
- A model patient : Female pelvic anatomy can be viewed in diverse 3-dimensional images with a new interactive tool
- Jiajia Luo, James A. Ashton-Miller, John O.L. DeLancey
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?