Discussion: ‘Uterine artery embolization vs surgery’ by van der Kooij et al - 01/10/11
Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.08.001
David Chelmow, MD : Moderator
Leo J Dunn Distinguished Professor and Chair, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA
Sara E. Ivey, MD, MPH : Discussant
Resident Physician, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA
Beth Lyn Tozer, MD : Discussant
Resident Physician, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA
Nicole W. Karjane, MD : Discussant
Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA
Résumé |
In the roundtable that follows, clinicians discuss a study published in this issue of the Journal in light of its methodology, relevance to practice, and implications for future research. Article discussed:
van der Kooij SM, Bipat S, Hehenkemp WJK, et al. Uterine artery embolization vs surgery in the treatment of symptomatic fibroids: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:317.e1-18.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
© 2011
Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Vol 205 - N° 4
P. e1-e3 - octobre 2011 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Intraperitoneal temperature and desiccation during endoscopic surgery : Intraoperative humidification and cooling of the peritoneal cavity can reduce adhesions
- Roberta Corona, Jasper Verguts, Robert Koninckx, Karina Mailova, Maria Mercedes Binda, Philippe R. Koninckx
- A regressive Meigs syndrome after definitive adnexal torsion
- Pascal Rousset, Pierre-Fleury Chaillot, Anne-Sophie Bats, Marie-Aude Le Frère Belda, Jean-Noël Buy
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?